Realnetworks, Inc. et al v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. et al

Filing 1755

Download PDF
Realnetworks, Inc. et al v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. et al Doc. 1755 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 J. TONY SERRA, SBN 32639 ANNA LING, SBN 196023 506 Broadway San Francisco CA 94133 Telephone: 415/986-5591 Attorneys for Defendant EDWARD PARK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CR 05-00375 SI Plaintiff, v. EDWARD PARK, Defendant ________________________________/ EXHIBITS TO DEFENDANT PARK'S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR VIOLATION OF RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Regarding Exhibits to Defendant Park's Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Violation of Right to Due Process and Equal Protection under the Fifth Amendment (see attached list): This filing is in paper or physical form only, and is being maintained in the case file in the Clerk's office. If you are a participant in this case, this filing will be served in hard-copy shortly. For information on retrieving this filing directly from the court, please see the court's main web site at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov under Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s): 26 27 P IE R 5 L A W O F F IC E S 506 BRO ADW AY S A N FR A N C I S C O ( 4 1 5 ) 986-5591 F A X : (415) 421-1331 Voluminous Document (PDF file size larger than the efiling system allows) 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 P IE R 5 L A W O F F IC E S 506 BRO ADW AY S A N FR A N C I S C O ( 4 1 5 ) 986-5591 F A X : (415) 421-1331 Exhibit A, Zimmer, L., and Morgan, J., Marijuana Myths, Marijuana Facts: A Review of the Scientific Evidence, New York and San Francisco, The Lindesmith Center (1997) Chapter 4 Exhibit B, Zimmer, L., and Morgan, J., Marijuana Myths, Marijuana Facts: A Review of the Scientific Evidence, New York and San Francisco, The Lindesmith Center (1997) Chapters 7 and 9 Exhibit C, Select Comm. on Sci. & Tech., House of Lords, Sess. 1997-1998, Ninth Report, Cannabis: The Scientific and Medical Evidence: Report section 4.3 (Nov. 4, 1998) Exhibit D, Opinion and Recommended Ruling, Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law and Decision of Administrative Law Judge, Section VIII, paragraphs 15 and 16 Exhibit E, Terhune, K.W., Ippolito, C.A., Hendricks, D.L., Michalovic, J.G., Bogema, S.C., Santinga, P., Blomberg, R., & Preusser, D.F. (1992), The Incidence and Role of Drugs in Fatally Injured Drivers. Report Number DOT HS 808 065. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Pp. I and 100 Exhibit F, W. Hindrik and J. Robbe and J. O'Hanlon. 1993, Marijuana and Actual Driving Performance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Report No. DOT HS 808 078. Exhibit G, Marijuana and Driving: A Review of the Scientific Evidence, compiled by NORML, March 18, 2004. Exhibit H, Relevant pages from Institute of Medicine, Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base (Janet E. Joy, et al. eds, 1999) Exhibit I, Gieringer, D., St. Laurent, J., and Goodrich, S., Cannabis Vaporizer Combines Efficient Delivery of THC with Effective Suppression of Pyrolytic Compounds, Journal of Cannabis Therapeutics, Vol. 4(1), 2004 Exhibit J, Ford, D., Marijuana Use Is Not Associated with Head, Neck or Lung Cancer in Adults Younger than 55 Years: Results of a Case Cohort Study Exhibit K, Report by Fred Gardner, C-Notes, June 29, 2005. Exhibit L, List of Health Organizations Supporting Immediate Legal Access and Research of Medical Marijuana compiled by NORML, Dec. 21, 2004. Exhibit M, List of Active State Medical Marijuana Programs compiled by NORML, Dec. 01, 2004. Exhibit N, European Drug Policy: 2002 Legislative Update, NORML, March 20, 2003. 2 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?