Wong et al v. Golden State Supply Inc et al
Filing
28
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/18/09. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2009)
Case 3:08-cv-04569-JCS
Document 27
Filed 05/15/2009
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
tan S. Mallison (SBN 184191) Hector R. Martinez (SBN 206336) LAW OFFICES OF MALLISON & MARTINEZ 1042 Brown Avenue Lafayette, CA 94549 Telephone: (925) 283-3842 Facsimile: (925) 283-3426 StanM@MallisonLaw.com HectorM@MallisonLaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: C 08-04569 JCS PATRICK WONG, and CARLOS SUAREZ, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. GOLDEN STATE SUPPLY, INC. (a California Corporation); GENERAL PARTS, INC. (a Northern Carolina Corporation); and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 08-04569 JCS
S
Case 3:08-cv-04569-JCS
Document 27
Filed 05/15/2009
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 P Date:
laintiff PATRICK WONG's and Plaintiff CARLOS SUAREZ' NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL came before this Court on May 15, 2009. Having duly considered such notice of settlement and request for dismissal with prejudice by Plaintiff PATRICK WONG and Plaintiff CARLOS SUAREZ, good cause having been shown from said notice and request, and records in the file, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff PATRICK WONG's and Plaintiff CARLOS SUAREZ' complaint, and claims therein, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 18
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
RT U O
, 2009
UNIT ED
S
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 08-04569 JCS
A
C
LI
FO
seph C. Judge Jo
Spero
R NIA
Hon. Joseph C. Spero United States Magistrate udge
NO
________
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?