KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka

Filing 217

ORDER ADVANCING HEARING; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 184 CITY OF EUREKA'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR NAMING KENNETH DAER AS INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 26, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In a Joint Case Management Statement filed March 19, 2010, counsel for Daer explained that he had understood the City's motion to have been resolved by the Court's February 26, 2010 order declining to shorten time for the hearing thereon and granting a brief interim extension to April 5, 2010.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF EUREKA, Defendant. __________________________________/ AND RELATED COUNTER AND CROSS CLAIMS __________________________________/

No. C-08-4571 MMC ORDER ADVANCING HEARING; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CITY OF EUREKA'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR NAMING KENNETH DAER AS INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT

United States District Court

Before the Court is Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff City of Eureka's ["City"] Motion for Leave to Extend Deadline for Naming Kenneth Daer as an Individual Defendant, filed February 23, 2010 and noticed for hearing on April 2, 2010, by which motion the City seeks an extension from March 12, 2010 to July or August 2010, in order to depose said defendant and amend, if appropriate, to add him in his individual capacity to the City's thirdparty complaint. As of March 26, 2010, no opposition had been filed.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On March 26, 2010, the above-titled action came before the Court for a regularly scheduled Case Management Conference, at which counsel for all parties to the action, including counsel for both the City and Daer, appeared. Having discussed the above-referenced motion with counsel appearing at the Case Management Conference, the Court ADVANCED the hearing on said motion to March 26, 2010, and ruled as follows: To the extent the motion seeks an extension, the motion is hereby GRANTED, and the deadline to name Daer as an individual defendant is hereby EXTENDED to April 30, 2010; to the extent the motion seeks an extension of greater length, the motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

2