KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka

Filing 239

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC. TO RESPOND TO CITY OF EUREKA'S THIRD AMENDED COUNTER-CLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM. The response shall be filed no later than June 4, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 25, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

GLENN A. FRIEDMAN, SBN 104442 ROBERT FARRELL, SBN 107461 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH L L P One Sansome Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Eml: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Defendant and Counter-Defendant ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation dba NORMAN'S DRY CLEANER, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC. TO RESPOND TO CITY OF EUREKA'S THIRD AMENDED COUNTER-CLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM Action Filed: 10/01/08

14 v. 15 16 17 18 AND ALL RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS AND 19 THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. 20 CITY OF EUREKA, et al., Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between counsel for Defendant, Cross21 Claimant and Counter Claimant CITY OF EUREKA ("Eureka") and Defendant, Cross-Defendant and 22 Counter-Defendant ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC. ("Eco Dry") that Eco Dry shall have an extension 23 of time to and including June 4, 2010 to respond to Eureka's Third Amended Counter-Claim and Cross24 Claim in this action. 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28
48 29 -45 81 -47 90 .1

1 STIP T O E X T E ND T H E T IM E F O R E C O D R Y F A M E R . T O R E S PO N D T O CFE 'S 3 R D A M D C M P T & CR S-CL AIM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Dated: May 21, 2010

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

By

/s/ ROBERT W. FARRELL ROBERT W. FARRELL Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Defendant and Counter-Defendant ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC.

Dated: May 21, 2010

DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT LLP

By

/s/ CHARLES H. BLOOM CHARLES H. BOLCOM Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Claimant and Counter-Claimant THE CITY OF EUREKA

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
48 29 -45 81 -47 90 .1

Dated: May 25 , 2010 __

By MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Court Judge

2 STIP T O E X T E ND T H E T IM E F O R E C O D R Y F A M E R . T O R E S PO N D T O CFE 'S 3 R D A M D C M P T & CR S-CL AIM