KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka
Filing
345
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOLUTIONS, INC.'S TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING. ERI has until December 24, 2010 to file a responsive pleading to KFD's Third Amended complaint and the City of Eureka's Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/23/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2010)
KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka
Doc. 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Gordon & Rees LLP 655 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825
KATHLEEN M. RHOADS (SBN: 144466) GEORGE A. ACERO (SBN: 226709) GORDON & REES LLP 655 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 565-2900 Facsimile: (916) 920-4402 Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant, Counter-Claimant and Cross-Defendant ENVIRONMENTAL RESOLUTIONS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v s. ) ) CITY OF EUREKA, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________ ) ) CITY OF EUREKA, ) ) Counter-Claimant and Third ) Part y Plaintiff, ) ) v s. ) ) KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California ) Corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner, UNOCAL ) CORPORATION, ) ) Cross-Defendant and Third ) Part y Defendant. ) __________________________________________ ) ) UNOCAL CORPORATION, ) ) Third Party Defendant and ) Third Party Plaintiff, ) ) v s. ) ) ENVIRONMENTAL RESOLUTIONS, INC. ) ) Third Party Defendant. ) -1Stipulation To Extend Environmental Resolutions, Inc.'s Time To File A Responsive Pleading Case No. CV-08-4571MMC
CASE NO. CV-08-4571MMC STIPULATION TO EXTEND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOLUTIONS, INC.'S TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND ORDER
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Gordon & Rees LLP 655 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825
The Court has recently granted in part, and denied in part, ERI's motion to dismiss. In these circumstances, ERI has 14 days to file a responsive pleading. (See F.R.C.P. 12(a)(4)(A).) However, in its ruling, the Court granted leave to amend as to certain causes of action. The parties have been given until December 10, 2010, to file an amended complaint, which is after ERI's time to file a responsive pleading expires. To avoid the parties filing unnecessary pleadings and motions, the Parties stipulate that ERI has until December 24, 2010 to file a responsive pleading to KFD's Third Amended complaint and the City of Eureka's Third Amended Complaint. Should any of these parties file amended pleadings pursuant to the Court's November 12, 2010 order, the deadlines to respond to such amended pleadings shall be those deadlines provided under the Federal Rules and this stipulation shall not apply. Dated: November 22, 2010 GORDON & REES LLP
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Stipulation To Extend Environmental Resolutions, Inc.'s Time To File A Responsive Pleading Case No. CV-08-4571MMC
By:
/s/ George A. Acero ________________________________ KATHLEEN M. RHOADS GEORGE A. ACERO Attorneys for Environmental Resolutions, Inc.
Dated: November 22, 2010
GREBEN & ASSOCIATES
By:
/s/ Jan A. Greben ________________________________ Jan A. Greben Shelley O'Connor Attorneys for KFD Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Gordon & Rees LLP 655 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825
Dated: November 22, 2010
DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT LLP
By:
/s/ Charles Bolcom ________________________________ MORIS DAVIDOVITZ CHARLES BOLCOM STACEY ALTON Attorneys for City of Eureka
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 23, 2010 DATED: ____________________
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
__________________________________________ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
-3Stipulation To Extend Environmental Resolutions, Inc.'s Time To File A Responsive Pleading Case No. CV-08-4571MMC
ZRCA/1058074/8804512v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?