KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka

Filing 351

ORDER DENYING OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LARSON'S ORDER GRANTING CITY OF EUREKA'S MOTION TO COMPEL. KFD has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/2/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2010)

Download PDF
KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka Doc. 351 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc.'s ("KFD") objection, filed November 29, 2010, to Magistrate Judge James Larson's Order granting the City of Eureka's motion to compel KFD's further written responses and production of documents. Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the objection, for the reason KFD has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) (providing district court may reconsider magistrate's order where it has been shown to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2010 v. CITY OF EUREKA, Defendants / United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaners, Plaintiff, No. C 08-4571 MMC ORDER DENYING OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LARSON'S ORDER GRANTING CITY OF EUREKA'S MOTION TO COMPEL MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?