KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka

Filing 351

ORDER DENYING OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LARSON'S ORDER GRANTING CITY OF EUREKA'S MOTION TO COMPEL. KFD has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/2/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2010)

KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka

Doc. 351

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc.'s ("KFD") objection, filed November 29, 2010, to Magistrate Judge James Larson's Order granting the City of Eureka's motion to compel KFD's further written responses and production of documents. Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the objection, for the reason KFD has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (providing district court may reconsider magistrate's order where it has been shown to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2010 v. CITY OF EUREKA, Defendants / United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California Corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaners, Plaintiff,

No. C 08-4571 MMC ORDER DENYING OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LARSON'S ORDER GRANTING CITY OF EUREKA'S MOTION TO COMPEL

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com