KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka

Filing 532

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULED FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. KFD's opposition to Multimatic's motion for summary judgment is due September 21, 2012. Multimatic's reply is due September 28, 2012. The hearing on the motion is scheduled for October 12, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 12, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES
125 E DE LA GUERRA, SUITE 203
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]

Jan A. Greben, State Bar No. 103464
[e-mail]
Jeff G. Coyner, State Bar No. 233499
[e-mail]
Danielle De Smeth, State Bar No. 263309
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Cross Defendant, Third Party Defendant,
Counter Defendant and Counter Claimant KFD Enterprises, Inc.,
a California corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner, and
Third Party Defendant Kenneth Daer

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14

Case No. CV-08-4571 MMC

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California
Corporation dba Norman’s Dry Cleaner,
Plaintiff,

15
16

vs.

17

CITY OF EUREKA,
Defendant.

18

STIPULATION TO MODIFY HEARING
DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

19
20
21

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
AND THIRD PARTY CLAIMS

22
23

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7 (a), plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc. (“KFD”) and defendants

24

Multimatic LLC and The Kirrberg Corporation (collectively, “Multimatic”), hereby stipulate to

25

modify the hearing date and briefing schedule for Multimatic’s Motion for Summary Judgment,

26

filed on June 1, 2012 as document 524. The modified schedule is as follows:

27

September 21, 2012 KFD’s Opposition due

28

September 28, 2012 Multimatic’s Reply due
October 12, 2012

Hearing at 9:00 a.m.
1

STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE- Case No. CV-08-4571 MMC

1

The parties have not previously requested an extension of time. Good cause is shown as

2

further discovery is necessary for KFD to respond to Multimatic’s motion, including but not

3

limited to the depositions of Multimatic’s FRCP 30(b)(6) representatives.

4
5
6

Dated: June 8, 2012

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

7
8

/s/ Jan A. Greben

9

JAN A. GREBEN
DANIELLE DE SMETH
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant
KFD Enterprises, Inc.

10
11
12
13

Dated: June 8, 2012

DONGELL LAWRENCE FINNEY LLP

14
/s/ Thomas F. Vandenburg
15
THOMAS F. VANDENBURG
CHRISTOPHER W. SMITH
Attorneys for Defendants Multimatic LLC, a New
Jersey limited liability company and The Kirrberg
Corporation, a New Jersey corporation

16
17
18
19
20

S

24

LI

ER

A

H

27

Ju

RT

26

NO

25

ey

. Chesn

xine M
dge Ma

R NIA

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

23

UNIT
ED

22

RT
U
O

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
2
STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE- Case No. CV-08-4571 MMC