KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka
Filing
539
ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR ONE-HOUR OF ADDITIONAL TIME FOR DEPOSITION QUESTIONS OF PETER KRASNOFF (Dkt. No. 537). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/2/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
KFD ENTERPRISES, INC.,
13
Plaintiff - Counter-Defendant - Cross-
14
Defendant,
15
v.
Case No.: C08-4571 MMC (JSC)
ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER
RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
ONE-HOUR OF ADDITIONAL TIME
FOR DEPOSITION QUESTIONS OF
PETER KRASNOFF (Dkt. No. 537)
16
17
CITY OF EUREKA,
18
Defendant - Counter-Claimant -
19
Cross-Claimant.
20
21
Now pending before the Court is Defendant City of Eureka’s Motion for One-Hour of
22
Additional Time for Deposition Questions of Peter Krasnoff. (Dkt. No. 537). The motion
23
indicates that Defendant sent a letter to counsel for Mr. Krasnoff, Robert Epstein, on July 27,
24
2012 requesting additional time for Mr. Krasnoff’s deposition. It does not appear that counsel
25
for Mr. Krasnoff responded. The underlying motion followed on July 30, 2012. Counsel for
26
the City of Eureka and counsel for Mr. Krasnoff are ordered to meet and confer
27
telephonically or in person regarding continuing Mr. Krasnoff’s deposition by August 10,
28
2012. See Local Rule 1-5(n). In accordance with this Court’s Standing Order, the parties
1
shall file a joint letter summarizing their meet and confer and advising the Court as to whether
2
a dispute remains by Wednesday, August 15, 2012.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: August 2, 2012
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?