KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka

Filing 586

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying without prejudice 579 Motion to Strike (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC.,

13

Plaintiff - Counter-Defendant - Cross-

14

Defendant,

15

Case No.: 08-4571 MMC (JSC)
ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE
CITY OF EUREKA’S RULE 26
DISCLOSURES (Dkt No. 579)

v.

16
17

CITY OF EUREKA,

18

Defendant - Counter-Claimant -

19

Cross-Claimant.

20
21

Plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc., (“KFD”) seeks to recover damages from Defendant

22

City of Eureka (“the City”) and several other defendants relating to contamination of the soil

23

and groundwater at a dry cleaning site it operates. Now pending before the Court is KFD’s

24

Motion to Strike the City of Eureka’s February 20, 2013 Rule 26(e) Disclosures. (Dkt. No.

25

579.) After carefully considering the pleadings and having had the benefit of oral argument

26

on April 25, 2013, for the reasons stated on the record the Court DENIES the motion to strike

27

without prejudice to renewal in the event that the City serves supplemental expert reports.

28

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: April 25, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2