KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka

Filing 594

ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on May 14, 2013. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., 13 Plaintiff - Counter-Defendant - Cross- 14 Case No.: 08-4571 MMC (JSC) ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE Defendant, 15 v. 16 17 CITY OF EUREKA, 18 Defendant - Counter-Claimant - 19 Cross-Claimant. 20 21 The parties appeared before the Court for a telephonic discovery hearing on May 13, 22 2013. As discussed at the hearing, the parties are meeting and conferring to attempt to 23 resolve an outstanding dispute regarding expert discovery. If the parties are unable to reach 24 an agreement regarding this matter, they are to file a joint statement on May 24, 2013. The 25 parties also discussed the possibility of the City of Eureka filing a motion to continue the trial 26 date. Upon consultation with the District Court, the parties are advised that any such motion 27 shall be heard by the undersigned judge. 28 1 Accordingly, if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute themselves, they shall file 2 a joint statement regarding the expert discovery dispute and a joint statement regarding the 3 request to continue the trial date by noon, May 24, 2013. Both matters shall be heard on May 4 30, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: May 14, 2013 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?