KFD Enterprises Inc v. City of Eureka
Filing
594
ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on May 14, 2013. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
KFD ENTERPRISES, INC.,
13
Plaintiff - Counter-Defendant - Cross-
14
Case No.: 08-4571 MMC (JSC)
ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON MOTION
TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
Defendant,
15
v.
16
17
CITY OF EUREKA,
18
Defendant - Counter-Claimant -
19
Cross-Claimant.
20
21
The parties appeared before the Court for a telephonic discovery hearing on May 13,
22
2013. As discussed at the hearing, the parties are meeting and conferring to attempt to
23
resolve an outstanding dispute regarding expert discovery. If the parties are unable to reach
24
an agreement regarding this matter, they are to file a joint statement on May 24, 2013. The
25
parties also discussed the possibility of the City of Eureka filing a motion to continue the trial
26
date. Upon consultation with the District Court, the parties are advised that any such motion
27
shall be heard by the undersigned judge.
28
1
Accordingly, if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute themselves, they shall file
2
a joint statement regarding the expert discovery dispute and a joint statement regarding the
3
request to continue the trial date by noon, May 24, 2013. Both matters shall be heard on May
4
30, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: May 14, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?