City of Alameda, California et al v. Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund et al
Filing
261
ORDER re: dismissal with correct date signed by Judge (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
2
3
4
Case Numbers
IN RE NUVEEN FUNDS/CITY OF
ALAMEDA SECURITIES LITIGATION
5
6
7
_______________________________________
9
10
11
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
__________________________________
BERNARD OSHER TRUST DTD 3/8/88
BERNARD A. OSHER, TRUSTEE
8
C 08-04575 SI
C 09-01437 SI
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF ALAMEDA CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss
14
Plaintiffs Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund, the Nuveen Municipal Trust on
15
behalf of its series Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund, and Pacific Specialty Insurance Co.
16
(collectively “Nuveen”) claims against Defendant Stone & Youngberg, LLC (“S&Y”) with
17
Prejudice (“Stipulation”), and the Court being fully advised in the premises,
18
HEREBY ORDERS that the Stipulation is GRANTED. Nuveen’s claims against S&Y
19
are hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41, with Nuveen and S&Y to pay their
20
own fees and costs.
August
21
22
30th
July
DATED this _____ day of ____________, 2011.
23
24
BY THE COURT:
25
26
__________________________________
HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
27
28
{00306424.DOCX; 1}
1
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. C 08-04575 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?