City of Alameda, California et al v. Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund et al

Filing 261

ORDER re: dismissal with correct date signed by Judge (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 2 3 4 Case Numbers IN RE NUVEEN FUNDS/CITY OF ALAMEDA SECURITIES LITIGATION 5 6 7 _______________________________________ 9 10 11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE __________________________________ BERNARD OSHER TRUST DTD 3/8/88 BERNARD A. OSHER, TRUSTEE 8 C 08-04575 SI C 09-01437 SI Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF ALAMEDA CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 12 13 THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss 14 Plaintiffs Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund, the Nuveen Municipal Trust on 15 behalf of its series Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund, and Pacific Specialty Insurance Co. 16 (collectively “Nuveen”) claims against Defendant Stone & Youngberg, LLC (“S&Y”) with 17 Prejudice (“Stipulation”), and the Court being fully advised in the premises, 18 HEREBY ORDERS that the Stipulation is GRANTED. Nuveen’s claims against S&Y 19 are hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41, with Nuveen and S&Y to pay their 20 own fees and costs. August 21 22 30th July DATED this _____ day of ____________, 2011. 23 24 BY THE COURT: 25 26 __________________________________ HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 27 28 {00306424.DOCX; 1} 1 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 08-04575 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?