City of Alameda, California et al v. Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund et al

Filing 63

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER. Settlement Conference set for 5/28/2009 at 09:30 AM. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 02/24/09. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. NUVEEN MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME OPPORTUNITY FUND, ET AL., Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The above matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero for settlement purposes. You are hereby notified that a Settlement Conference is scheduled for May 28, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. It is the responsibility of counsel to ensure that whatever discovery is needed for all sides to evaluate the case for settlement purposes is completed by the date of the Settlement Conference. Counsel shall cooperate in providing discovery informally and expeditiously. Lead trial counsel shall appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties. Any party who is not a natural person shall be represented by the person(s) with unlimited authority to negotiate a settlement. A person who needs to call another person not present before agreeing to any settlement does not have full authority. If a party is a governmental entity, its governing body shall designate one of its members or a senior executive to appear at the Settlement Conference with authority to participate in the Settlement Conference and, if a tentative settlement agreement is reached, to CITY OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA, ET AL., Plaintiff(s), No. C08-04575 SI (JCS) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 recommend the agreement to the governmental entity for its approval. An insured party shall appear with a representative of the carrier with full authority to negotiate up to the limits of coverage. Personal attendance of a party representative will rarely be excused by the Court, and then only upon separate written application demonstrating substantial hardship served on opposing counsel and lodged as early as the basis for the hardship is known but no later than the Settlement Conference Statement. Each party shall prepare a Settlement Conference Statement, which must be LODGED with the undersigned's Chambers (NOT electronically filed) no later than fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the conference. Please 3-hole punch the document at the left side. The Settlement Conference Statement need not be served on opposing counsel. The parties are encouraged, however, to exchange Settlement Conference Statements. If Settlement Conference Statements are exchanged, any party may submit an additional confidential settlement letter to the Court not to exceed three (3) pages. The contents of this confidential settlement letter will not be disclosed to the other parties. The Settlement Conference Statement shall not exceed ten (10) pages of text and twenty (20) pages of exhibits and shall include the following: 1. 2. A brief statement of the facts of the case. A brief statement of the claims and defenses including, but not limited to, statutory or United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 other grounds upon which the claims are founded, and a candid evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses. The more candid the parties are, the more productive the conference will be. 3. A list of the key facts in dispute and a brief statement of the specific evidence relevant to a determination of those facts. 4. 5. trial. 6. The relief sought, including an itemization of damages. A summary of the proceedings to date and any pending motions. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of past settlement discussions. The Court's time can best be used to assist the parties in completing their negotiations, not in starting them. Accordingly, Plaintiff(s) must serve a demand in writing no later than fourteen (14) days before the conference and Defendant(s) must respond in writing no later than eight (8) days before the conference. The parties are urged to carefully evaluate their case before taking a settlement position since extreme positions hinder the settlement process. Settlement Conference Statements may be submitted on CD-ROM with hypertext links to exhibits. Otherwise, the portion of exhibits on which the party relies shall be highlighted. It is not unusual for the conference to last three (3) or more hours. Parties are encouraged to participate and frankly discuss their case. Statements they make during the conference will not be admissible at trial in the event the case does not settle. The parties should be prepared to discuss such issues as: 1. 2. 3. Their settlement objectives. Any impediments to settlement they perceive. Whether they have enough information to discuss settlement. If not, what additional United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 information is needed? 4. The possibility of a creative resolution of the dispute. The parties shall notify Chambers immediately at (415) 522-3691 if this case settles prior to the date set for Settlement Conference. Counsel shall provide a copy of this order to each party who will participate in the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 24, 2009 JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?