Actividentity Corporation v. Intercede Group PLC et al

Filing 122

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 97 Motion for Protective Order; granting 101 Motion to Seal Document 101 MOTION to Seal Document 98 Declaration in Support, 99 Declaration in Support,, 97 MOTION for Protective Order Barring the Disclosure of Intercede Confidential Information to Mr. Michael Neumann MOTION to Seal Document 98 Declaration in Support, 99 Declaration in Support,, 97 MOTION for Protective Order Barring the Disclosure of Intercede Confid ential Information to Mr. Michael Neumann, 97 MOTION for Protective Order Barring the Disclosure of Intercede Confidential Information to Mr. Michael Neumann ; denying 109 Motion to Seal Document ; denying 110 Motion to Strike (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) v. ) INTERCEDE GROUP PLC, et al.,) ) ) Defendant(s). ) ACTIVIDENTITY CORP., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C08-4577 VRW (BZ) THIRD DISCOVERY ORDER

After reviewing the papers in this case, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order Barring the

Disclosure of Intercede Confidential Information to Mr. Michael Neumann (Doc. No. 97) is GRANTED as unopposed. 2. Defendants' Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 101) is GRANTED

for the following documents: 1. Defendants' Motion for Protective Order (Doc.

No. 97.) 2. 3. Declaration of Richard Parris (Doc. No. 98) Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Richard Parris

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3.

4.

Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Joseph Belichik

(Doc. No. 99). Defendants' Motion to Seal Exhibit 12 to the See Contratto v. Ethicon,

Belichick Declaration is DENIED.

Inc., 227 F.R.D. 304, 307 (N.D. Cal. 2005). 4. Defendants' Motion for Sanctions and Contempt (Doc. If defendants wish,

No. 108) is DENIED without prejudice.

they may re-file a properly noticed motion in compliance with the Civil Local Rules. 5. as moot. 6. Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 109) Exhibit 1 Contratto, 227 F.R.D. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 110) is DENIED

to the Holloway Declaration is DENIED. at 307. Dated: February 1, 2010

Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge
G:\BZALL\-REFS\ACTIVIDENTITY V. INTERCEDE\DISC ORD 3.FINAL RULING.wpd

2