Schmidt et al v. Pentair, Inc. et al

Filing 97

ORDER vacating courtroom meet and confer session re 95 Order, Set Hearings. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/27/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2010)

Download PDF
Schmidt et al v. Pentair, Inc. et al Doc. 97 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California BRENDAN SCHMIDT, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. C 08-04589 TEH (MEJ) PENTAIR, INC., et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ ORDER VACATING COURTROOM MEET AND CONFER SESSION On October 20, 2010, the Court ordered the parties to appear for a courtroom meet and confer session regarding outstanding discovery disputes. (Dkt. #95.) In response, the parties filed a joint letter requesting that the Court vacate its order because they have actively engaged in discussions and it is possible that the issues in dispute will be narrowed to "no more than a handful of unresolvable issues." (Dkt. #96.) The parties further "commit to the Court to provide one revised letter of no more than 4 single-spaced pages addressing the few unresolved issues." Id. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby VACATES the October 29, 2010 courtroom meet and confer session. Within 14 days from the date of this Order, the parties shall file a joint letter of no more than 4 single-spaced pages, excluding the caption page. In case the Court determines that further in-person discussions are necessary, the parties shall include their availability for a mutuallyconvenient in-person meet and confer session in San Francisco between now and the end of the year. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 27, 2010 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?