Hawks v. Curry et al
ORDER Requesting Supplemental Briefing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on May 11, 2010. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HAROLD HARVEY HAWKS, Petitioner v. BEN CURRY, Respondent. / No. C 08-4605 JSW ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues relating to federal review of parole decisions in California. See Hayward v. Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2010) (en banc). The Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to submit supplemental briefs (not to exceed 12 pages in length) explaining their reviews on how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this parole denial habeas case. The Court HEREBY ORDERS the following briefing schedule: 1. By no later than June 14, 2010, Respondent shall file a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 2. By no later than June 28, 2010, Petitioner shall file a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 11, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?