Reyes v. Premier Home Funding, Inc. et al
Filing
173
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ASE SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED. Show Cause Response due by 2/21/2014. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/6/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
BERNARDO REYES,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
No. C 08-04606 JSW
v.
PREMIER HOME FUNDING, INC., et al.,
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE
TRANSFERRED
Defendants.
/
14
Related Third-Party Claims.
15
/
16
17
In the motion to reopen this action, defendant, formerly World Savings Bank, FSB,
18
renamed to Wachovia Mortgage, FSB and now merged into Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells
19
Fargo”) requested that this action be transferred to the Central District of California. However,
20
Wells Fargo has since clarified that it does not intend to formally move to transfer this action,
21
despite the fact that all of the witnesses and the remaining parties, except for one in Texas,
22
either reside in are or headquartered in the Central District of California. Courts may “transfer
23
a case sua sponte under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, as codified at 28 U.S.C. §
24
1404(a), so long as the parties are first given the opportunity to present their views on the
25
issue.” Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986).
26
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a district court may transfer a civil action to any district
27
where the case could have been filed originally, for the convenience of the parties and
28
witnesses, and in the interest of justice. District courts use a two-step analysis to determine
whether
1
transfer is proper. Step one considers the threshold question of whether the action might have
2
been brought in the district to which transfer is sought. Id. If venue is proper in the transferee
3
district, the district court has discretion “to adjudicate motions for transfer according to an
4
individualized, case-by-case consideration of convenience and fairness.” Steward Org., Inc. v.
5
Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988). The court considers relevant factors, such as the
6
plaintiff’s choice of forum, the local interest in the issue, the relative ease of access to evidence,
7
the availability of compulsory process for unwilling witnesses and the cost involved in securing
8
willing witnesses, the familiarity of each forum with applicable law, and the relative court
9
congestion in each forum. Decker Coal. Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co, 805 F.2d 834, 843
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
(9th Cir. 1986) (citing Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 508-09 (1947)).
The Court is providing the parties to present their views on this issue through this Order
12
to Show Cause (“OSC”). The parties are HEREBY ORDERED to Show Cause in writing by no
13
later than February 21, 2014 why this case should not be transferred to the Central District of
14
California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).
15
The Court FURTHER ORDERS that the case management conference currently set for
16
February 14, 2014 is VACATED. The Court will reschedule the case management conference
17
if necessary at a later date.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: February 6, 2014
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
BERNARDO REYES,
Case Number: CV08-04606 JSW
6
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
v.
8
PREMIER HOME FUNDING, INC, ET AL
9 et al,
Defendant.
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
13
That on February 6, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
14 placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter
listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an
15 inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17 G.M. Candelario
Joel Madera Candelario
18 8592 Fairmont Circle
Westminster, CA 92683
19
20
21 Dated: February 6, 2014
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?