Reyes v. Premier Home Funding, Inc. et al

Filing 173

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ASE SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED. Show Cause Response due by 2/21/2014. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/6/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 BERNARDO REYES, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, No. C 08-04606 JSW v. PREMIER HOME FUNDING, INC., et al., 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED Defendants. / 14 Related Third-Party Claims. 15 / 16 17 In the motion to reopen this action, defendant, formerly World Savings Bank, FSB, 18 renamed to Wachovia Mortgage, FSB and now merged into Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells 19 Fargo”) requested that this action be transferred to the Central District of California. However, 20 Wells Fargo has since clarified that it does not intend to formally move to transfer this action, 21 despite the fact that all of the witnesses and the remaining parties, except for one in Texas, 22 either reside in are or headquartered in the Central District of California. Courts may “transfer 23 a case sua sponte under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, as codified at 28 U.S.C. § 24 1404(a), so long as the parties are first given the opportunity to present their views on the 25 issue.” Costlow v. Weeks, 790 F.2d 1486, 1488 (9th Cir. 1986). 26 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a district court may transfer a civil action to any district 27 where the case could have been filed originally, for the convenience of the parties and 28 witnesses, and in the interest of justice. District courts use a two-step analysis to determine whether 1 transfer is proper. Step one considers the threshold question of whether the action might have 2 been brought in the district to which transfer is sought. Id. If venue is proper in the transferee 3 district, the district court has discretion “to adjudicate motions for transfer according to an 4 individualized, case-by-case consideration of convenience and fairness.” Steward Org., Inc. v. 5 Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29 (1988). The court considers relevant factors, such as the 6 plaintiff’s choice of forum, the local interest in the issue, the relative ease of access to evidence, 7 the availability of compulsory process for unwilling witnesses and the cost involved in securing 8 willing witnesses, the familiarity of each forum with applicable law, and the relative court 9 congestion in each forum. Decker Coal. Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co, 805 F.2d 834, 843 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 508-09 (1947)). The Court is providing the parties to present their views on this issue through this Order 12 to Show Cause (“OSC”). The parties are HEREBY ORDERED to Show Cause in writing by no 13 later than February 21, 2014 why this case should not be transferred to the Central District of 14 California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). 15 The Court FURTHER ORDERS that the case management conference currently set for 16 February 14, 2014 is VACATED. The Court will reschedule the case management conference 17 if necessary at a later date. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: February 6, 2014 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 BERNARDO REYES, Case Number: CV08-04606 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 PREMIER HOME FUNDING, INC, ET AL 9 et al, Defendant. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 13 That on February 6, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by 14 placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an 15 inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 G.M. Candelario Joel Madera Candelario 18 8592 Fairmont Circle Westminster, CA 92683 19 20 21 Dated: February 6, 2014 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?