Thompkins v. Curry

Filing 9

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/30/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. B. CURRY, Warden, Respondent. RUFUS THOMPKINS, Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 08-4671 JSW (PR) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Docket No. 6) Petitioner, a prisoner of the State of California has filed a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Respondent has filed an answer. Petitioner has filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file a traverse to Respondent's answer to the petition (docket no. 6). Good cause appearing, his request for an extension of time is GRANTED (docket no. 6). Petitioner's traverse is deemed timely filed. The petition is now submitted for consideration on the merits. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 30, 2009 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. B. CURRY et al, Defendant. RUFUS THOMPKINS, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case Number: CV08-04671 JSW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on October 30, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Rufus Thompkins D33938 Correctional Training Facility P.O. Box 689 Soledad, CA 93960 Dated: October 30, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?