Erspamer v. Morrison & Foerster LLP Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 106

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re 104 Proposed Order, filed by Morrison & Foerster LLP Long Term Disability Plan. Signed by Judge James Larson on 7/12/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2010)

Case3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document104

Filed06/18/10 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GORDON ERSPAMER, Plaintiff, vs. MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendant.

CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Administrative Motion for Sur-Reply and for Oral Argument on Plaintiff's Motion to Quash or For a Protective Order ("Defendant's Administrative Motion"). The Court, Magistrate Judge Larson presiding, having considered the parties' respective briefs, and the supporting declarations and exhibits, hereby orders that Defendant's Administrative Motion be GRANTED. The Court grants Defendant the opportunity to file a Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Quash or For a Protective Order ("Plaintiff's Motion to Quash"). Such Sur/// /// 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL)

PRU/1054181/8073555v.1

Case3:08-cv-04692-MMC Document104

Filed06/18/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111

Reply must be filed no later than June 28, 2010. Additionally, the Court grants Defendant's request for oral argument at the hearing on June 30, 2010 on Plaintiff's Motion to Quash. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 12 DATED: June ______, 2010 James Larson United States Magistrate Judge Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR SUR-REPLY AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. C08-04692 MMC (JL)