Scott v. Pro's Choice Beauty Care, Inc.
Filing
22
ORDER CONTINUING DATE FOR RULE 26 DISCLOSURES. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 19, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2009)
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA
Document 21-2
Filed 02/18/2009
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES
MELODIE K. LARSEN, (SBN 110819) E-mail: mlarsen@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Defendant PRO'S CHOICE BEAUTY CARE, INC. DAVID A. MARKHAM (SBN 071814) Email: dmarkham@clarkmarkham.com R. CRAIG CLARK (SBN 129912) Email: cclark@clarkmarkham,com JAMES TREGLIO (SBN 228077) Email: jtreglio@clarkmarkham.com CLARK & MARKHAM LLP 600 B. Street, Suite 2130 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619.239.1321 Fax: 619.239.5888 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bonnie Scott UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BONNIE SCOTT, an individual, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PRO'S CHOICE BEAUTY CARE, INC., Defendant. Case No. C08-4697-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DATE FOR RULE 26 DISCLOSURES
LA #4812-8979-3027 v1
CASE NO.: C08-4697-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA
Document 21-2
Filed 02/18/2009
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES
ORDER
Good cause appearing, the deadline for Rule 26 disclosures is continued from
UNIT ED
S
February 19, 2009 to March 4, 2009. Date: February 19 2009 __,
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
____________________________ lsup ill m A Judge W William H. Alsup,ia ER United States District Judge C N F
D IS T IC T O R
A
LA #4812-8979-3027 v1
-1-
CASE NO. C08-4697-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER
LI
FO
R NIA
O IT IS S
ORDER
ED
RT U O
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?