Loharsingh v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 71

CORRECTED STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 03/29/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2010)

Case3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document70

Filed03/26/10 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235 DANIEL A. ZAHEER, State Bar #237118 Deputy City Attorneys Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MALEHKI LOHARSINGH, Plaintiff, vs. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; HEATHER FONG in her capacity as Chief for SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICERS TRAPSI #1991, NEVES #1016, and FRANCO #1443, individually and in their capacities as SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; and DOES 1-100, inclusive; individually and in their capacities as Officers of SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Case No. C08-04725 JCS CORRECTED STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Trial Date: April 26, 2010

Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Order CASE NO. C08-04725

1

n:\lit\li2008\090463\00619106.doc

Case3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document70

Filed03/26/10 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The undersigned parties, being all the parties who have appeared in this action, STIPULATE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), that the action on behalf of plaintiff MALEKI LOHARSINGH against City And County Of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, HEATHER FONG, Police Officers TRAPSI, NEVES, and FRANCO is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. As a condition of DISMISSAL it is further STIPULATED that plaintiff and defendants shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 26, 2010

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS JOHN L. BURRIS BENJAMIN NISENBAUM By: /s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum BENJAMIN NISENBAUM Attorneys for Plaintiff **Pursuant to General Order 45, §X.B., the filer of this document attests that s/he has received the concurrence of this signatory to file this document.

Dated: March 26, 2010 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy SEAN F. CONNOLLY DANIEL A. ZAHEER Deputy City Attorneys By: /s/ Sean F. Connolly SEAN F. CONNOLLY Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Order CASE NO. C08-04725

2

n:\lit\li2008\090463\00619106.doc

Case3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document70

Filed03/26/10 Page3 of 3

1 2

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Order CASE NO. C08-04725

ER

N

By:

F D IS T IC T O R

HON. JAMES C. SPERO JOSEPH

A

C

LI

3

March 29, 2010 Dated: ______________________

FO
n:\lit\li2008\090463\00619106.doc

Judge Jo

seph C.

Spero

3

R NIA

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT ED

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

RT U O

NO

RT

H