Blevins v. Starbucks Coffee Company
ORDER Granting re 22 Request for Dismissal Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on June 15, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2009)
Filed06/05/09 Page1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
STEPHAN C. WILLIAMS, State Bar No. 37755 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. WILLIAMS 1615 Bonanza Street, Suite 211 Walnut Creek, CA 04596 Tel: 925-939-6822 Fax: 926-939-6823 e-mail: email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff KATHY BLEVINS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 KATHY BLEVINS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In accordanced with the terms of the Settlement Agreement reached between the parties, and the specific request of the plaintiff:
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Case No. C-08-4759-EDL
Case No. C-08-04759 EDL REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.
Comes now the plaintiff, KATHY BLEVINS, in the above-entitled action, who is requesting of the court to dismiss, in its totality, the action filed by her and pending in this court. The case has been settled to the satisfaction of the plaintiff, and a court order dismissing the case is needed to comply with the terms of the settlement. The dismissal is with prejudice. DATED: June 5, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. WILLIAMS By: /s/ Stephan C. Williams Attorney for Plaintiff KATHY BLEVINS
Filed06/05/09 Page2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of this court enter into the files a dismissal of this action in its entirety, with prejudice.
S DISTRICT TE C TA
MAGISTRATE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Case No. C-08-4759-EDL
_________________________________ ER C JUDGE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT N F
D IS T IC T O R
June 15, 2009 DATED: June 5, 2009
IT IS S
RT U O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?