Blouin v. Comcast Corp.

Filing 31

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE re 30 Stipulation filed by Comcast Corp.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/16/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW PALO A L T O

SPIRO, MOSS LLP Ira Spiro, State Bar No. 67641 11377 W. Olympic Blvd. 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90064 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff SHAWN BLOUIN MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP DARYL S. LANDY, State Bar No. 136288 THERESA MAK, State Bar No. 211435 2 Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN BLOUIN, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. COMCAST CORP. and DOES 1-50, Defendants.

Case No. 3:08-CV-04787-MEJ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED REVISED DEADLINES

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED REVISED DEADLINES
(Case No. 3:08-CV-04787-MEJ)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW PALO A L T O

Plaintiff Shawn Blouin ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Comcast Corporation ("Comcast"), the parties to the above-entitled action (collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), submit this Stipulation to the Court: STIPULATION WHEREAS, on June 8, 2010, the Parties attended a second private mediation session with Mediator Mark Rudy; WHEREAS, at the close of the mediation, the mediator made a mediator's proposal, i.e. a settlement recommended by the mediator that becomes effective only if accepted by both parties; WHEREAS, the mediator set June 18, 2010 as the last date to accept or reject the proposal; WHEREAS, the same date, June 18, 2010, is that date by which, pursuant to the Court's order of on March 1, 2010, the parties are to submit proposed revised deadlines if the case does not settle; WHEREAS, the Parties believe it would promote efficiency and preserve resources to conclude the current settlement negotiations before submitting proposed revised deadlines because the outcome of the settlement negotiations may obviate the need to submit proposed revised deadlines; WHEREAS, in light of the above factors, the Parties have agreed to seek to continue the deadline to submit proposed revised deadlines by two weeks, to July 2, 2010; // // // // // // // // //
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED REVISED DEADLINES
(Case No. 3:08-CV-04787-MEJ)

28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW PALO A L T O

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their undersigned respective counsel, stipulate and request that the Court continue the deadline for the Parties to submit proposed revised deadlines to July 2, 2010.

Dated: June 10, 2010

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

By

/s/ Daryl S. Landy Daryl S. Landy Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CORPORATION

Dated: June 10, 2010

SPIRO, MOSS LLP

By

/s/ Ira Spiro Ira Spiro Attorneys for Plaintiff SHAWN BLOUIN

ORDER In light of the foregoing STIPULATION of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Parties' deadline to submit proposed revised deadlines is continued to July 2, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 16, 2010 HON. MARIA ELENA JAMES U.S. District Court Judge

Dated:

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED REVISED DEADLINES
(Case No. 3:08-CV-04787-MEJ)