Sussex Financial Enterprises, Inc. v. Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG et al

Filing 169

ORDER denying 167 Objections to Order of Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 2/17/2010. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SUSSEX FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BAYERISCHE HYPO-UND VEREINSBANK AG, et al., Defendants. ) Case No. 08-4791 SC ) ) ORDER DENYING OBJECTIONS TO ) MAGISTRATE'S ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Court has received Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate's Order and Request for District Court's De Novo Review of Order, Docket No. 167 ("Objection"), which raises objections to the Magistrate Judge's January 28, 2010 order addressing discovery issues and administrative relief, Docket No. 162 ("Magistrate's Order"). The Court has reviewed, de novo, the matters outlined in

the Objection as well as the papers submitted by both parties in the underlying dispute, and finds no reason to disturb the Magistrate's Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

Any legal error in the Magistrate's Order is deemed to be insubstantial, and the Court agrees in substance with the outcome reached by the Magistrate Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff's Objection is DENIED.

Dated: February 17, 2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE