Artifex Software Inc. v. Diebold Inc. et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Motion Hearing set for 3/6/09 is continued to 4/3/2009 10:00 AM. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Gregory L. Lippetz (SBN 154228) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY Silicon Valley Office 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-739-3900 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants DIEBOLD INC. and PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC.

Darin W. Snyder (SBN 136003) Luann L. Simmons (SBN 203526) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTIFEX SOFTWARE INC., Plaintiff, v. DIEBOLD INC., an Ohio corporation, PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

Case No. C 08-04837 SC STIPULATION CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT DIEBOLD INC.'S FRCP 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AGAINST DIEBOLD, INC.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiff Artifex Software Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Diebold Inc. and Premier Election Solutions, Inc. (together "Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, that pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rules 6-1(a) and 7-7(b), Defendant Diebold's FRCP 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim Against Diebold, Inc. will be continued from March 6, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. to April 3, 2009 at 10:00 a.m., in the above-entitled Court, located at Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102.

SVI-66287v1

STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING DATE Case No. C 08-04837 SC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. Dated: February 20, 2009 JONES DAY

By:

/s/ Gregory L. Lippetz Gregory L. Lippetz

Attorneys for Defendant DIEBOLD INC. and PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC. In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. Dated: February 20, 2009 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By:

/s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder

Attorneys for Plaintiff ARTIFEX SOFTWARE INC.

UNIT ED

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SVI-66287v1

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-04837 SC

A

C

LI

FO

Judge S

amuel C

onti

R NIA

IT IS S

O ORD

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT
H