Artifex Software Inc. v. Diebold Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER re 6 Stipulation filed by Premier Election Solutions, Diebold Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/12/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008)

Case 3:08-cv-04837-EMC

Document 6

Filed 11/11/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Gregory L. Lippetz (SBN 154228) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY Silicon Valley Office 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-739-3900 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants DIEBOLD INC. and PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC.

Darin W. Snyder (SBN 136003) Luann L. Simmons (SBN 203526) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTIFEX SOFTWARE INC., Plaintiff, v. DIEBOLD INC., an Ohio corporation, PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

Case No. C 08-04837 EMC STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiff Artifex Software, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Diebold, Inc. and Premier Election Solutions, Inc. (together "Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, that pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants shall have until December 12, 2008 to file their answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in this matter.

SVI-63393v1

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-04837 EMC

Case 3:08-cv-04837-EMC

Document 6

Filed 11/11/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. Dated: November 11, 2008 JONES DAY

By:

/s/ Gregory L. Lippetz Gregory L. Lippetz

Attorneys for Defendant DIEBOLD INC. and PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC. In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. Dated: November 11, 2008 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By:

/s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder

Attorneys for Plaintiff ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

dwar Judge E

d M. Ch

en

R NIA

_________________ RED Edward M. Chen S SO ORDE I I Judge U.S. MagistrateT

UNIT ED

18

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

SVI-63393v1

NO

RT

H

-2-

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. C 08-04837 EMC