Stevenson Enterprises v. Mendoza et al

Filing 198

ORDER RE: JUDGMENT re 196 Proposed Order, filed by Stevenson Enterprises. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/23/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 John J. Verber, CASB# 139917 Jack W. Schwartz Jr., CASB #124506 BURNHAM BROWN A Professional Law Corporation P.O. Box 119 Oakland, California 94604 --1901 Harrison Street, 14th Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 444-6800 Facsimile: (510) 835-6666 Email: Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant STEVENSON ENTERPRISES, a California general partnership 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 STEVENSON ENTERPRISES, a California general partnership 14 v. 16 ENRIQUETA MENDOZA; ESTATE OF DAVID Z. MENDOZA; HAK CHON LEE; JEUM SOON LEE; HYSL, Inc., a California corporation; and YONG W. LEE, 18 19 20 21 [ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN] Plaintiff, 15 17 No. C 08-4845 EMC Defendants. ______________________________________ _ AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS AND COUNTER-CLAIMS [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF STEVENSON ENTERPRISES’ MOTION FOR REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT HAK CHON LEE Date: Time Courtroom: Judge: December 12, 2014 2:30 p.m. 5 (17th Floor) Hon. Edward M. Chen 22 Plaintiff Stevenson Enterprises’ Motion For Request For Entry Of Judgment Against 23 Hak Chon Lee came on for hearing on December 12, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 of this 24 Court, the Honorable Edward M. Chen, Presiding. 25 Plaintiff was represented by Jack W. Schwartz Jr. of the law firm of Burnham Brown 26 and Defendant Hak Chon Lee was represented by his counsel, Brian Lee. The Court, having 27 reviewed the papers filed in support of the subject motion and having received the arguments 28 of counsel finds that Plaintiff’s Motion should be granted and a Judgment should be entered in 1 [Proposed] Order On Plaintiff Stevenson Enterprises’ Motion For Request For Entry Of Judgment Against Defendant Hak Chon Lee C 08-4845 EMC 1 favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Hak Chon Lee. 2 FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 3 Plaintiff’s Motion Is Granted. 4 Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff Stevenson Enterprises and against 5 Defendant Hak Chon Lee as follows: $465,683.30 6 $344,401.34 Plaintiff is awarded a total of $466,683.34 consisting of $395,098.46 costs and 7 expenses incurred in the investigation and remediation of the VOC impaction caused by 8 Defendant Hak Chon Lee. Plaintiff is further awarded as damages $143,206.75 attorneys fees $121,281.96 and costs. RT U O 15 NO 16 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO RT 17 dward Judge E ER n M. Che H 18 19 N F D IS T IC T O R 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order On Plaintiff Stevenson Enterprises’ Motion For Request For Entry Of Judgment Against Defendant Hak Chon Lee R NIA 14 FO 13 LI 12 A 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Defendant Hak Chon Lee by 12/30/14 and e-file a certificate of service. ISTRIC Dated: December 23 2014 ___, ____________________________ ES D TC TDISTRICT COURT A JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES T FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA S 10 UNIT ED 9 C 08-4845 EMC C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?