Slider v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 46

ORDER granting extension (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2009)

Case3:08-cv-04847-SI Document45

Filed09/15/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar #69888 BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar #222173 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 [phone] Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN SLIDER,
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Case No. C 08-04847 SI STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE

Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation; WAYNE TUCKER, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF OAKLAND; JOHN CUNNIE, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF OAKLNAND; JOSEPH SESMIRE, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF OAKLAND; WILLIAM BARDSLEY, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF OAKLAND; A & B AUTO COMPANY, a corporation; DOES 4-50, inclusive Defendants.

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

/ STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, the parties file this stipulated motion to extend the ADR deadline in this case. The parties have agreed to mediation of this matter through an ADR-appointed mediator, and Michael Bien, Esq. has been appointed as mediator. Mediation was to have been completed by September 30, 2009. The parties have been engaged in discovery in this action, but further discovery

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER EXTENDING ADR DEADLINES Case No. C 08 04847 SI

1

Case3:08-cv-04847-SI Document45

Filed09/15/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

must be completed in order to conduct meaningful ADR discussions. The parties have conferred with Mr. Bien, the ADR appointed mediator in this action, who concurs with the parties' request to extend the ADR deadline. Discovery in the case is proceeding, and the parties and Mr. Bien have agreed to conduct the mediation on or before December 4, 2009, when all parties will have completed discovery sufficiently for purposes of mediation.

Dated: September 1, 2009

The Law Offices of John L. Burris

__/s/_____________________________ Benjamin Nisenbaum Attorney for Plaintiff (

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

proposed) Order PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, good cause based on the parties' need to conduct additional discovery, the Court hereby Orders that the deadline for completion of ADR in this action is hereby extended to December 4, 2009.

23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:_____________ _______________________________ Hon. Susan Ilston United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER EXTENDING ADR DEADLINES Case No. C 08 04847 SI

2