Genentech, Inc. et al v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH et al

Filing 457

ORDER enlarging briefing schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)

Genentech, Inc. et al v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH et al

Doc. 457

1 Counsel Listed on Following Page 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 GENENTECH, INC. and BIOGEN IDEC 17 INC., 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
01731.51443/3680378.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CASE NOS. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ), 09-cv-4919-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2] Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge

Defendants.

Case Nos. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ); 09-cv-4919-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 2 SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 3 [e-mail] 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) [e-mail] 7 Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672) [e-mail] 8 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 9 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 10 Attorneys for Defendant Genentech, Inc. 11 TOWNSEND, TOWNSEND & CREW LLP 12 James G. Gilliland (Bar No. 107988) [e-mail] 13 David J. Tsai (Bar No. 244479) [e-mail] 14 James D. Tario (Bar No. 257783) [e-mail] 15 Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor 16 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 18 19 Anne M. Rogaski (Bar No. 184754) [e-mail] 379 Lytton Avenue 20 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
01731.51443/3680378.1

6

FOLEY HOAG LLP Donald R. Ware (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Claire Laporte (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Jeremy A. Younkin [e-mail] Seaport World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, MA 02210-2600 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant Biogen Idec Inc. HARVEY SISKIND LLP D. Peter Harvey (Bar No. 55712) [e-mail] Naomi Jane Gray [e-mail] Raffi V. Zerounian (Bar No. 236388) [e-mail] Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO William E. Solander (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] Dominick A. Conde (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] Peter D. Shapiro (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] Joshua A. Davis (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 212-218-2200 Attorneys for Plaintiff Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

Case Nos. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ); 09-cv-4919-SI 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

2 ("Sanofi") and Defendants Genentech, Inc. ("Genentech") and Biogen Idec Inc. ("Biogen") 3 respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation regarding the briefing schedule for 4 Defendants' Replies in support of their Motions for Summary Judgment. The parties now AGREE 5 AND STIPULATE to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their Replies from September 23, 6 2010 to September 30, 2010. 7 8 1. Reason for the Request

In its Order Granting Sanofi's Motion To Adjourn Hearing for Defendants' Motions for

9 Summary Judgment Under Local Rule 6-3, the Court reset the hearing of Defendants' Motions for 10 Summary Judgment for October 26, 2010. (D.N. 428.) Defendants had initially noticed the hearing 11 for the Motions for September 17, 2010. The Court directed Sanofi to file its Oppositions to the 12 Motions by September 16, 2010 and directed Defendants to file their Replies in Support of the 13 Motions by September 23, 2010. 14 Defendants' Replies are due two days after the close of fact discovery, a critical juncture in

15 this case. Defendants' responses to Sanofi's latest requests for production and interrogatories are 16 due on September 20, and Defendants have noticed depositions of third party fact witnesses for 17 September 20 and 21. Defendants therefore request a one-week extension to provide them adequate 18 time in which to respond to Sanofi's Oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment. 19 Defendants do not request any change in the hearing date. The requested extension would leave 25 20 days between the submission of Defendants' replies in support of their motions for summary 21 judgment and the hearing. 22 23 2. Prior Time Modifications

The time for Sanofi to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint was previously

24 extended. The briefing and hearing schedule for Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 25 brought by Sanofi and its former co-defendants was temporarily vacated. The briefing and hearing 26 schedule for Genentech's Motion To Disqualify McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert and Berghoff LLP was 27 extended by four weeks. The briefing and hearing schedule for Sanofi's Motion for Leave to 28 Amend Its Pleadings and Infringement Contentions was previously extended by five weeks and then
01731.51443/3680378.1

Case Nos. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ); 09-cv-4919-SI 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1 extended again by seven weeks. The Markman hearing and tutorial were previously continued by 2 45 days. The briefing and hearing schedule for Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment was 3 previously extended, as described above. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
01731.51443/3680378.1

3.

Effect of Requested Modification

The requested modification will have no effect on the rest of the schedule in this action. So Stipulated.

Case Nos. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ); 09-cv-4919-SI 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1 DATED: September 16, 2010 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DATED: September 16, 2010 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: September__, 2010 23 24 25 26 27 28
01731.51443/3680378.1

HARVEY SISKIND LLP FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO

By /s/William E. Solander William E. Solander Attorneys for Plaintiff Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By /s/Victoria F. Maroulis Victoria F. Maroulis Attorneys for Defendant Genentech, Inc.

DATED: September 16, 2010

TOWNSEND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP FOLEY HOAG LLP

By /s/Claire Laporte Claire Laporte Attorneys for Defendant Biogen Idec Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________________ Susan Illston United States District Court Judge

Case Nos. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ); 09-cv-4919-SI 5 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1 2 I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used

3 to file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff 4 has concurred in this filing. 5 6 7 DATED: September 16, 2010 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
01731.51443/3680378.1

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By /s/Victoria F. Maroulis Victoria F. Maroulis Attorneys for Defendant Genentech, Inc.

Case Nos. 08-cv-4909-SI (BZ); 09-cv-4919-SI 6 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT