Afshardoust et al v. Chertoff et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge Illston on 1/14/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-04952-SI Document 6 Filed 01/05/2009 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division MELANIE L. PROCTOR (CSBN 228971) Melanie.Proctor@usdoj.gov Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-6730 FAX: (415) 436-7169 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CHANGIZ AFSHARDOUST; AKRAM ANSARY, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; et al., Defendants. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// STIPULATION TO DISMISS No. C 08-4952 SI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 08-4952 SI STIPULATION TO DISMISS; PROPOSED ORDER Case 3:08-cv-04952-SI Document 6 Filed 01/05/2009 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate to dismiss the above captioned matter, without prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs and fees. Dated: January 5, 2009 Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ MELANIE L. PROCTOR1 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants Dated: January 5, 2009 /s/ MARY BETH KAUFMAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall close the file. ___________________________ SUSAN ILSTON United States District Judge I, Melanie L. Proctor, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. STIPULATION TO DISMISS No. C 08-4952 SI 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?