Hu v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc et al

Filing 109

ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti denying 98 Administrative Motion (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 In re CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. ) Case No. 08-4966 SC SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ORDER DENYING ) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION This Order Relates to: ) ) CASE NOS. 08-4966 SC, 08-5027 SC, ) and 08-5273 SC ) ) On May 6, 2010, one day prior to the Case Management Conference, Defendant Cadence Design Systems, Inc. ("Cadence") filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and for Judgment on the Pleadings. Docket No. 84 ("MPSJ"). Now before the Court is IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff Alaska Electrical Pension Fund's Administrative Motion to continue indefinitely this MPSJ pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. Docket No. 98. Docket No. 101. // // // // // // // ("Motion"). Cadence has filed an opposition.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
For the Northern District of California

Civil Local Rule 7-11 is inte l 1 ended for "miscellaneous r l d t o w e a administrative matters, not otherwise governed by a federal statute, Federal or local rule or standing order of the as ssigned judge," such as "m u motions t exceed otherwise applicable pa to d i i age limitations or motions to file documents under seal." t c a 7-11. Civ L. R. v.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide the appropriate e l d p See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f). Accordingly, the Cour r rt

procedure here.

DENIES Plaintiff's Motion. a

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED. S E

United States District Court

Dated: June 2 2010 d 2, UNITED STATES DIS T STRICT JUDGE U

2