Hu v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc et al

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER Enlarging Time to Answer or Respond to Complaint (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP ETHAN D. DETTMER, SBN 196046, EDettmer@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Attorneys for Defendants CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., MICHAEL J. FISTER, WILLIAM PORTER, AND KEVIN S. PALATNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHANGHUI HU, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., MICHAEL J. FISTER, WILLIAM PORTER and KEVIN S. PALATNIK, Defendant. CASE NO. CV 08-4966 SC STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO COMPLAINT WHEREAS, on October 29, 2008, Plaintiff Changhui Hu filed a complaint in this Court naming as defendants Cadence Design Systems, Inc. ("Cadence"), Michael J. Fister, William Porter, and Kevin S. Palatnik (together "Defendants"); WHEREAS, another complaint has been filed against Cadence and certain of the additional defendants in this Court containing similar allegations; WHEREAS, to conserve the resources of the parties and the Court, the parties have agreed that Defendants need not answer or otherwise respond to the actions filed against Defendants until after a lead plaintiff is selected and a consolidated amended complaint is filed and served on Defendants. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), by and between Plaintiff and Defendants that the time by which Defendants must answer or otherwise respond in the above-captioned action is extended until after the Court's order selecting a lead 1 STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME CASE NO. CV 08-4966 SC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP plaintiff and the filing of a consolidated amended complaint in this action. In the event that Plaintiff Hu is determined to be lead plaintiff, Defendants will have 45 days after the filing of the consolidated amended complaint to file their response. Plaintiff will have 45 days after the filing of the response to file any opposition, and Defendants will have 30 days in which to file any reply. DATED: November 24, 2008 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: /s/ Ethan D. Dettmer Ethan D. Dettmer Attorneys for Defendants CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., MICHAEL J. FISTER, WILLIAM PORTER and KEVIN S. PALATNIK DATED: November 24, 2008 MILBERG LLP By: /s/ Jeff S. Westerman Jeff S. Westerman Attorneys for Plaintiff CHANGHUI HU 100550739_1.DOC 2 STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME CASE NO. CV 08-4966 SC plaintiff and the filing of a consolidated amended complaint in this action. In the event that Plaintiff 2 Hu is determined to be lead plaintiff, Defendants wil have 45 days after the filing of the consolidated 3 amended complaint to file their response. Plaintiff will have 45 days after the filing of the response 4 to file any opposition, and Defendants wil have 30 days in which to file any reply. 5 DATED: ,\ - '"~- O~ 6 7 8 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., MICHAEL J. FISTER, WILLIAM PORTER and KEVIN S. P ALA TNIK 12 DATED: l) ~ J ~~'O 8 13 14 15 By: 16 17 18 19 I0055073CJ_I.DOC Attorneys for Plaintiff CHANGHUIHU UNIT ED 20 21 S ISTRIC ES D TC AT T 22 NO 24 25 ER N F D IS T IC T O R 26 27 28 Gibson. Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME CASE No. CV 08-4966 SC A C LI 23 FO Judge S amuel C onti R NIA O ORD IT IS S ERED RT U O RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?