Jackson v. Hense
Filing
43
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 25, 2012. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/25/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tmi, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
CLIFFORD L. JACKSON, JR.,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
MIKE McDONALD, Warden,
)
)
Respondent.
)
______________________________ )
No. C 08-4974 MMC (PR)
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
ON APPEAL; DIRECTIONS TO
CLERK
(Docket No. 42)
13
14
On October 30, 2008, petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the
15
above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging
16
the validity of a judgment obtained against him in state court. On February 17, 2012, the
17
Court denied the petition on the merits and denied a certificate of appealability. Petitioner
18
thereafter filed a notice of appeal. Now before the Court is petitioner’s request to proceed in
19
forma pauperis on appeal. In its order denying the petition, the Court declined to issue a
20
certificate of appealability and determined there were no valid grounds for an appeal.
21
Consequently, petitioner fails to show good cause to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
22
Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is hereby DENIED.
23
The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to petitioner and to the
24
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, wherein petitioner may renew his request. See Fed. R. App.
25
P. 24(a).
26
This order terminates Docket No. 42.
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
DATED: April 25, 2012
_________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?