Morris v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing Motion Hearing and Case Management Conference to 02/08/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/20/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 1--, PATRICIA K. GILLETTE (STATE BAR NO. 74461) pgil1etteorrick.com GREG J. RICHARDSON (STATE BAR NO. 203788) grichardson@orrick.com KATINA B. MUSTER (STATE BAR NO. 244914) kminer@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: +1-415-773-5700 Facsimile: +1-415-773-5759 Attorneys for Defendants FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, WARREN HOWARD, ROBIN KAN and ANNE MARIE KOHLIGTAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I-) DEIRDRE MORRIS, Plaintiff, V. Case No. CV 08-498 1 TEH JOINT STIPULATION AND jPROPOSEDJ ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date: Time: Location: Judge: 14 15 16 17 18 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, WARREN HOWARD, ROBIN KAN and ANNE MARIE KOHLIGIAN, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Courtroom 12, 19th Floor Hon. Thelton E. Henderson JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SuMNIARY ADJUDICATION CV 084981 TEN - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Under Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties hereby stipulate to continue the date of the hearing on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment from November 16, 2009 to February 8, 2010, and to have Plaintiffs Opposition to the Summary Judgment be filed January 11, 2010, and Defendant's Reply filed January 25, 2010. This stipulation is due to the trial and briefing calendars of both parties. Plaintiffs counsel has been in trial in the month of October and is engaged in preparing multiple post-trial briefs, precluding him from working on the Opposition in this matter until after its current due date of October 26, 2009. After that date, Defendants' counsel has several pre-scheduled briefs in other matters and trial scheduled in December 2009, precluding counsel from preparing any Reply brief until January 2009. Therefore, the parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule pending the Court's approval: Plaintiffs Opposition to Summary Judgment: January 11, 2010. Defendants' Reply to Summary Judgment: January 25, 2010. 10:00 Hearing on the Summary Judgment Motion: February 8, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court may allow. Pursuant to the Local Rules, the Declaration of Greg J. Richardson setting forth the reasons for this continuance and extension of time accompanies this stipulation. - 2 - JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION cv 084981 TEH - _______________________________________ ____ __ Sent By: Law Offices of Pieter Bogaard; 4154600320; Oct-17-09 18:15; Page 2/2 I 2 3 4 5 Dated: October 12.. 2009 PATRICIA K. GILLETTE GREG J. RICHARDSON KATINA B. MINER ORRICK. HERRENGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 6 7 8 9 Dated: October 12. 2009 IsI Greg J. Richardson Greg 3. Richardson Attorneys for Defendants FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO. WARREN HOWARD, ROBiN KAN and ANNE MARIE KOl-ILIGIAN PIETER BOGAARDS ORRICK. HERRINOTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 12 13 14 15 16 eBgds Attorneys for Plaintiff LAW OFFICES OF PIETER BOGAARDS - * Concurrence in the filing of this document has been o&ained from the s ignatory. -_______________ __ PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, iT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/20/09 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2g - UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C HONORTA LE THELTON E. HENDERSON AB United States District Court Judge Ju ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 jOINT STIPUlATION AND PROPOSEO ORDER TO - A C LI HEARING ON DmnANTs MOTiON FOR Suw.tkRi AWtDrC.AT ION CV 084981 ml FO Com\uE e lton E. H dge The nderson R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?