Ankney v. Hub Group, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER re 26 Stipulation of dismissal filed by Gary Ankney. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/27/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard D. Black--CA State Bar No. 135765 Law Offices of Richard D. Black 1981 N. Broadway, Suite 340 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: (925) 932-8400 Facsimile: (925) 932-1147 E-mail: richardblack@sbcglobal.net Attorney for Plaintiff Gary Ankney UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GARY ANKNEY, Plaintiff, v. HUB GROUP, INC., a corporation, ROY ALLEN, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), with each party to bear his or her or its own costs of suit and attorneys' fees. DATED: May 22, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD D. BLACK Case No. 3:08-cv-05043 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ; ORDER By: __________/S/___________________________ RICHARD D. BLACK Attorneys for Plaintiff GARY ANKNEY DATED: May 22, 2009 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP By: __________/S/___________________________ LAURA J. MAECHTLEN Attorneys for Defendant HUB GROUP, INC. ORDER -1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The above entitled matter, Case No. 3:08-cv-05043, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear his or her or its own costs of suit and attorneys' fees. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HON. EDWARD CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT RDERED JUDGE UNIT ED S 5 Date: May 27, 2009 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O ER N F D IS T IC T O R -2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE SF1 28356805.1 A C LI FO dw Judge E ard M. Chen R NIA IT IS S OO NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?