American President Lines, Ltd. et al v. T&T Group, Inc.

Filing 14

ORDER granting extension to file response to complaint re 11 (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2009) Modified on 2/11/2009 (ys, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-05111-SI Document 11 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LUCAS VALLEY LAW MARK K. de LANGIS (SBN 190083) 2110 Elderberry Lane San Rafael, California 94903 Telephone: (415) 472-3892 Facsimile: (415) 472-3977 mdelangis@lucasvalleylaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and APL CO. Pte., LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 T&T GROUP, INC., a corporation, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs American President Lines, Ltd. and APL CO., Pte., Ltd. ("Plaintiffs") filed a Complaint on or about November 10, 2008 against Defendant T&T Group, Inc. ("T&T"); WHEREAS, T&T's response to the Complaint, absent extension, would originally have been due on or before December 22, 2008; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs agreed, pursuant Local Rule 6-1, to grant T&T an extension of time to and including January 11, 2009, in which to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs further agreed, pursuant Local Rule 6-1, to grant T&T a further extension of time to and including February 12, 2009, in which to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint; STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD., a corporation, and APL CO., Pte., LTD., a corporation, Case No. C 08-05111-SI STIPULATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1 FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT T&T GROUP, INC.'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO MARCH 12, 2009 -1- CASE NO. C 08-05111-SI Case 3:08-cv-05111-SI Document 11 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and T&T mutually agree to a further extension, through and including March 12, 2009, in which Defendant can answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint, for the reason that APL and T&T seek to explore all avenues of an early disposition of this dispute and are in the process of exchanging documents and information to that end; and WHEREAS, this extension of time is not for purposes of delay and is submitted in conjunction with the parties Stipulated Motion for Relief from Case Management Schedule, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: 1. The parties jointly stipulate that, pursuant Local Rule 6-1, T&T's time in which to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended to and include March 12, 2009. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: February 5, 2009 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ Bryan A. Kohm ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT T&T GROUP, INC. Dated: February 5, 2009 LUCAS VALLEY LAW By: /s/ Mark de Langis ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and APL CO., PTE.., LTD. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. IT IS SO ORDERED 26 27 Dated: ___________________________ 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ________________________________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE -2CASE NO. C 08-05111-SI Case 3:08-cv-05111-SI Document 11 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Mark K. de Langis, attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation Further Extending Time to Respond to Complaint has been obtained from any signatories indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the forgoing is true and correct. Executed this 6th day of February 2009, at San Rafael, California. ____/s/________________________ Mark K. de Langis STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -3- CASE NO. C 08-05111-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?