Shao v. Forster

Filing 134

ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL re #133 Stipulation filed by Yibo Shao. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/3/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LONG & LEVIT LLP
465 CALIFORNIA STREET SUITE 500 SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94104 [phone]

JOSEPH P. MCMONIGLE, State Bar #66811 JESSICA R. MACGREGOR, State Bar #168777 DAVID S. MCMONIGLE, State Bar #258980 LONG & LEVIT LLP 465 California Street Suite 500 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff YIBO SHAO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION YIBO SHAO, an individual, Plaintiff, vs. DENIS M. FORSTER, an individual, Defendant. CASE No. C08-5112 CRB STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL

On November 19th, the Court entered a conditional order of dismissal, which provided for dismissal without prejudice thirty days later. Pursuant to the terms of a settlement put on the record in this matter on November 5, 2009 and later reduced to a writing executed by Plaintiff/Counter-Respondent Yibo Shao ("Shao") and Defendant/Counter-Claimant Denis M. Forster ("Forster"), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Shao and Forster that this entire action, including all claims and counterclaims filed by Shao and/or Forster be dismissed with prejudice.

/// /// /// ///
CASE NO. C08-5112 CRB STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ORDER Based on the Parties' stipulation, this entire action, including any and all claims and counter-claims brought by any party is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2009 DENIS M. FORSTER Defendant/Counter-Claimant Dated: December 2, 2009 YIBO SHAO Plaintiff/Counter-Respondent

UNIT ED

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LONG & LEVIT LLP
465 CALIFORNIA STREET SUITE 500 SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94104 [phone]

3 Dated: December ___, 2009

Judge Charles R. BreyerED ER

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2
STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL

CASE NO. C08-5112 CRB

A

DOCS\S0138-719\571717.V1 8:02 AM

ER

C

LI

FO

J

arles R udge Ch

. Breyer

R NIA

O IT IS S

ORD

NO

RT

H