Valentine et al v. Nebuad, Inc. et al

Filing 211

STIPULATION AND ORDER vacating the 08/09/10 case management conference. The parties shall request for a future cmc date if needed. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/03/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2010)

Valentine et al v. NebuAd, Inc. et al

Doc. 211

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SCOTT A. KAMBER (pro hac vice) [e-mail] DAVID A. STAMPLEY (pro hac vice) [e-mail] KAMBERLAW, LLC 100 WALL STREET, 23rd Floor New York, New York 10005 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] JOSEPH H. MALLEY (pro hac vice) LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH H. MALLEY, P.C. 1045 North Zang Boulevard Dallas, Texas 75208 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] DAVID C. PARISI (SBN 162248) [e-mail] SUZANNE HAVENS BECKMAN (SBN 188814) [e-mail] PARISI & HAVENS LLP 15233 Valleyheart Drive Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Additional counsel listed on signature pages

ROBERT A. WEIKERT (State Bar No. 121146) [e-mail] TALLEY E. MCINTYRE (State Bar No. 203131) [e-mail] NIXON PEABODY LLP One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3600 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] JASON C. KRAVITZ (pro hac vice) [e-mail] NIXON PEABODY LLP 100 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110-2131 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant, NEBUAD, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAN VALENTINE, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. NEBUAD, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C08-cv-05113 (TEH) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Complaint Filed: November 10, 2008 Trial Date: None Set

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C08-CV-05113

13088184.4 -1-

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs and Defendant NebuAd, Inc. ("NebuAd") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On November 16, 2009, the Court set the further Case Management Conference

for March 1, 2009. (See DKT. 180). On December 10, 2009, the Parties filed a stipulation and proposed order, which was issued by the Court, to continue the hearing for NebuAd's Motion to Dismiss (DKT. 4), also to March 1, 2009. (DKTS. 186,187). 2. On February 22, 2010, the Parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order,

which was issued by the Court, to continue the further Case Management Conference and NebuAd's Motion to Dismiss to April 5, 2010. (DKTS. 193, 194). The Parties further stipulated (DKT. 195), which was issued by the Court (DKT. 196), that the further Case Management Conference and hearing on NebuAd's Motion to Dismiss (DKT. 4) would be continued to May 17, 2010. On May 10, 2010, the Parties then filed a joint stipulation and proposed order, which was ordered by the Court, to continue the further Case Management Conference and NebuAd's Motion to Dismiss until June 28, 2010. (DKTS. 197, 198). On June 21, 2010, the Parties jointly stipulated, which was ordered by the Court, that NebuAd's Motion to Dismiss be continued until after mediation should the mediation be unsuccessful. (DKTS. 201, 202). 3. As requested in the Parties' Joint Case Management Statement filed on June 21,

2010 (DKT. 199), at the June 28, 2010 Case Management Conference, the Court referred the case to U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero for settlement. (DKT. 206). On July 23, 2010, Judge Spero set the Settlement Conference for September 22, 2010. (DKT. 208). 4. In accordance with Court's instructions at the June 28, 2010 Case Management

Conference, the Parties hereby request that the further Case Management Conference and hearing on NebuAd's Motion to Dismiss (DKT. 4) shall be continued until after the Settlement Conference, should the Parties fail to resolve the case. 5. Should the Parties fail to resolve the case, the Parties agree, within 30 days after

the close of the Settlement Conference, to request a date for the further Case Management Conference and a date to calendar NebuAd's Motion to Dismiss.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C08-CV-05113

13088184.4 -2-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BRIAN J. PANISH (SBN 116060) [e-mail] RAHUL RAVIPUDI (SBN 204519) [e-mail] PANISH, SHEA & BOYLE, LLP 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 Los Angeles, California 90025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Additional Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: August 2, 2010 By: Dated: August 2, 2010 By:

Respectfully submitted, KamberLaw, LLC /s/ David A. Stampley DAVID A. STAMPLEY Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Nixon Peabody LLP /s/ Talley E. McIntyre TALLEY E. MCINTYRE Attorneys for Defendant NebuAd, Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C08-CV-05113

13088184.4 -3-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: August 2, 2010

GENERAL ORDER 45 CERTIFICATION I, David A. Stampley, hereby attest pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45 that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

KamberLaw, LLC By: _____/s/ David A. Stampley DAVID A. STAMPLEY Attorneys for Defendant NebuAd, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
08/03/10 Dated: ______________

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C _____________________________________ TA
Hon. Thelton E. Henderson United States District Judge

J

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C08-CV-05113

A

C

LI
13088184.4

-4-

FO

e lton E. H dge The u

nderson

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H