Valentine et al v. Nebuad, Inc. et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing the Motion Hearing to 3/2/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Plaintiffs shall have until 01/30/09 to respond to the motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/06/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2009) Modified on 1/7/2009 (rbe, COURT STAFF).

Alan Himmelfarb ­ SBN 90480 1 KAMBEREDELSON, LLC 2 2757 Leonis Boulevard Vernon, CA 90058 3 [phone] 4 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DAN VALENTINE, DALE MORENSEN, 10 MELISSA BECKER, SAMUEL GREEN, SHERRON RIMPSEY, CHARLOTTE 11 MIRANDA, FRANK MIRANDA, SAUL DERMER, WAYNE COPELAND, CRYSTAL 12 REID, ANDREW PAUL MANARD, KATHLEEN KIRCH, TERRY KIRCH NEIL 13 DEERING, PAUL DRISCOLL, individuals, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 14 situated, 15 16 17 v. Plaintiffs,

Case No.: 3:08-cv-05113-TEH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT NEBUAD, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson

NEBUAD, INC., a Delaware Corporation; 18 BRESNAN COMMUNICATIONS, a New York Corporation; CABLE ONE, a Delaware 19 Corporation; EMBARQ, a Delaware Corporation; KNOLOGY, a Delaware 20 Corporation; WOW!, a Delaware Corporation; and JOHN DOES 1-20, corporations, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT
NEBUAD, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING TIME FOR

1

Case No. BC 397095

1

Now before the Court is Plaintiffs' and Defendant NebuAd, Inc.'s Stipulation Regarding

2 Time for Plaintiff's Response to Defendant NebuAd, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. Upon 3 consideration of the stipulation, this Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs shall have until 4 January 30, 2009 to respond to Defendant NebuAd, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. The hearing on 5 Defendant NebuAd's Motion to Dismiss is hereby set for Monday, March 2, 2009 at 10:00 6 a.m. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT
NEBUAD, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING TIME FOR

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

01/06/09 Dated: ______________

UNIT ED

S

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson United States District Judge

S DISTRICT TE C _____________________________________ TA

Ju

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2

A

C

LI
Case No. BC 397095

FO

lton E. H dge The

enderso

n

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H