Thomas v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending defendant's time to respond to complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/08/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2009)

1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations 2 FRED R. PUGLISI, Cal. Bar No. 121822 3 [e-mail] JAMES J. MITTERMILLER, Cal. Bar No. 85177 4 [e-mail] VALERIE E. ALTER, Cal. Bar No. 239905 5 [e-mail] 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600 6 Los Angeles, California 90067-6017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 310-228-3701 8 Attorneys for Defendant, SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RUDOLPH THOMAS, Individually and 13 on behalf of all others similarly situated,, 14 15 v. Plaintiff, Case No. 3:08-cv-05119-TEH SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

16 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a 17 SPRINT, SPRINT PCS and/or NEXTEL and DOES 1 - 50, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
W02-WEST:1ESN1\401254021.2

[Complaint Filed: November 10, 2008]

-1-

1 2 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 ("Parties may stipulate in writing, without a

4 Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the 5 complaint, or to enlarge or shorten the time in matters not required to be filed or 6 lodged with the Court, provided the change will not alter the date of any event or any 7 deadline already fixed by Court order.") plaintiff Rudolph Thomas and defendant Sprint 8 Solutions, Inc., hereby stipulate: 9 10 1. To a seven (7)-day extension from January 7, 2009 to January 14,

11 2009 of the deadline for defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to 12 the Complaint in this action; and 13 14 2. If defendant Sprint Solutions, Inc. moves to dismiss the Complaint

15 rather than file an answer, plaintiff's time to oppose the motion to dismiss will be extended 16 by seven (7) days, from February 2, 2009 to February 9, 2009. 17 18 Dated: January 6, 2009 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
W02-WEST:1ESN1\401254021.2

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP // Fred R. Puglisi By FRED R. PUGLISI Attorneys for Defendant SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.

-2-

1 2 Dated: January 6, 2009 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 // Jeff D. Friedman By JEFF D. FRIEDMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff RUDOLPH THOMAS

HAGENS, BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

UNIT ED

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
W02-WEST:1ESN1\401254021.2

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

J

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-3-

A

01/08/09

C

LI

FO

e lton E. H dge The u

nderson

R NIA

OO IT IS S

RDERE

D

RT U O

NO

RT

H