Pecot et al v. San Francisco Deputy Sheriff's Association et al

Filing 77

ORDER to extend time to file motion for bond for derivative action re 76 Stipulation filed by Thomas Arata, Oscar Taylor, Stephen Tilton, Rich Owyang, Johna Pecot, Joseph Leake. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/19/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JOHNA PECOT, THOMAS ARATA, RICH OWYANG, STEPHEN TILTON, and 8 JOSEPH LEAKE, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of SAN FRANCISCO 9 DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Corporation, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit 13 Corporation, DAVID WONG, an individual, MICHAEL ZEHNER, an individual, BRIAN 14 SAVAGA, an individual, SHEDRICK McDANIELS, an individual, and DOES 115 100, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BASED ON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, to enable the parties to meaningfully participate in the settlement conference regarding the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint, and to see if there is a basis to settle all claims without incurring additional litigation expenses, the parties stipulated that this Court enter its order that defendants shall have until August 1, 2009, to file their motion for bond on the derivative claims for each defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. ISTRIC ES D TC AT T UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. CV-08-5125-CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE MOTION FOR BOND FOR DERIVATIVE ACTION Hon. Charles. R. Breyer Defendants. RT U O United States District Court Judge Charles R. Breyer h Judge C arles R. Breyer ER N F D IS T IC T O R STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR BOND FOR DERIVATIVE ACTION Case No. CV-08-5125-CRB A C LI FO R NIA D RDERE IS SO O ____________________________________________ IT NO UNIT ED S RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?