Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v. Primarion, Inc. et al

Filing 1616

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING POST TRIAL BRIEFING. Dfts' Post-trial Motions (Rules 50 and 59 and For Certification of Judgment) due by 6/24/2011. Opposition due 8/1/11 to Post trial motions; Opposition due8/3/11 to Certification Motion; Reply due 8/12/11. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/811. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 James W. Morando (State Bar No. 087896) jmorando@fbm.com Jeffrey M. Fisher (State Bar No. 155284) jfisher@fbm.com Farella Braun & Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Attorneys for Plaintiff VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. PRIMARION, INC., a Delaware corporation, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, a German corporation, and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Case No. CV-08-5129 JCS STIPULATION REGARDING POSTTRIAL BRIEFING Dept.: Judge: Courtroom A, 15th Floor Honorable Joseph C. Spero Complaint Filed: November 12, 2008 Trial Date: May 9, 2011 19 Defendants. 20 21 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun & Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION RE POST-TRIAL BRIEFING Case No. CV-08-5129 JCS 23666\2639250.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, trial of the initial phase in the above captioned action began on May 9, 2011 and concluded on May 24, 2011; WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a post-trial motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 and 59; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendants will file one combined 25 page Rule 50 and 59 post-trial motion; 7 WHEREAS, Defendants also intend to file a motion requesting that the Court certify a 8 judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and/or take other action to enable an 9 immediate appeal of the Court’s rulings and the jury’s verdict relating to the Burstein Patents; 10 WHEREAS, at the June 3, 2011 Status Conference, the Court directed that Defendants’ 11 motions should be heard on the same date, September 9, 2011, and directed the parties to provide 12 a briefing schedule with respect to these motions whereby Defendants’ reply memoranda would 13 be filed on August 12, 2011; 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WHEREAS, the Court has set a Case Management Conference for September 9, 2011, at which the parties will be prepared to discuss a schedule for the remainder of this action; and WHEREAS, the Court has ordered the parties to submit a Case Management Conference Statement on September 2, 2011; THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Defendants shall file and serve their combined Rules 50 and 59 post-trial motion (“Defendants’ Post-Trial Motion”) and supporting memorandum on June 24, 2011; 2. Defendants shall file and serve their motion regarding certification of a judgment 23 and supporting memorandum on June 24, 2011 (“Defendants’ Motion Re Certification of 24 Judgment”). Defendants’ motion shall raise all legal theories and arguments that Defendants will 25 make in connection with their request to seek immediate appellate review of any decision made to 26 date and orders or judgments made or entered with respect to the Burstein Patents regardless of 27 the underlying rule, statute, other authority, or other basis; 28 Farella Braun & Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION RE POST-TRIAL BRIEFING Case No. CV-08-5129 JCS -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. On August 1, 2011, Volterra shall file its opposition to Defendants’ Post-Trial Motion; 4. On August 3, 2011, Volterra shall file its opposition to Defendants’ Motion Re Certification of Judgment; 5. Defendants shall file their reply memoranda in support of both motions on August 12, 2011; and 6. The parties shall exchange proposed schedules for the remainder of this action and 8 shall meet and confer in advance of September 2, 2011 such that the parties can submit to the 9 Court a proposed schedule for the remainder or this action on September 2, 2011 in connection 10 with the September 9, 2011 Case Management Conference. 11 12 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP Dated: June 7, 2011 By: 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 16 17 /s/ Jeffrey M. Fisher______ Jeffrey M. Fisher Dated: June 7, 2011 McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 18 By: 19 _____/s/ Vera Elson_ Vera Elson Attorneys for Defendants PRIMARION, INC., INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION 20 21 22 23 S June 8 Dated ________________2011 ER seph C. Spero LI -3- H Case No. CV-08-5129 JCS RT STIPULATION RE POST-TRIAL BRIEFING Judge Jo FO NO 28 R NIA The Honorable Joseph Spero Magistrate Judge 27 Farella Braun & Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T A 26 APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED RT U O 25 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE UNIT ED 24 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?