Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v. Primarion, Inc. et al

Filing 1690

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON THAT MOTION. 1669 MOTION to Amend/Correct 92 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim, (Motion for Leave to Amend to Dismiss without Prejudice Defendants' Counterclaims) re-set for 2/17/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/9/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13

Case No. CV-08-5129 JCS

VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,

16

vs.
PRIMARION, INC., a Delaware corporation,
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, a German
corporation, and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES
NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation,

17

Defendants.

14
15

18
19

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
TO DISMISS WITHOUT
PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’
COUNTERCLAIMS (DKT.
NO. 1669) AND FOR
CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON
THAT MOTION
Date: January 13, 2012
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Location: Courtroom G - 15th Floor
Judge: Honorable Joseph C. Spero

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

20
21

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-1(b), the Parties to this Stipulation, Plaintiff Volterra
22
23

Semiconductor Corporation and Defendants Primarion, Inc., Infineon Technologies North

24

America Corp., and Infineon Technologies AG, by and through their respective counsel, jointly

25

stipulate to extending the deadlines for briefing of Defendants’ Motion for Leave To Amend To

26

Dismiss Without Prejudice To Defendants’ Counterclaims [Dkt. No. 1669] and the hearing on

27

that motion as follows:

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE

-1-

CASE NO.: c 08-05129-JCS
23666\2902757.1

1



Deadline for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to Motion for Leave. Extended from
December 28, 2011 to January 6, 2012.



Deadline for Defendants to file their Reply in Support of Motion for Leave.
Extended from January 4, 2012 to January 13, 2012.



Hearing on Motion for Leave. Reset from January 13, 2012 to January 20, 2012.

2
3
4
5

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2(a), the Declaration of Jeffrey M. Fisher in Support of Stipulation

6
7

and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Briefing on Defendants’ Motion for Leave is being

8

filled concurrently herewith. The Fisher Declaration sets forth with particularity the reasons for

9

the requested time modification, discloses all previous time modifications in this case, and

10
11
12

describes the effect the requested modification would have on the schedule for this case.
The extension is sought at the request of Plaintiff so that Plaintiff is accorded the 35-day
notice required by Local Rule 7-2(a), and so that Plaintiff will not need to submit briefing over

13
the holidays. The requested time modifications will not alter the existing schedule for the case.
14
15
16

AGREED AND SO STIPULATED.
Dated: December __, 2011

FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP
/s/ Jeffrey M. Fisher
Jeffrey M. Fisher

17
18

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
PRIMARION, INC., INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES AG, and INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.

19
20
21

I represent that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from each
of the other signatories which shall serve in
lieu of their signatures on this document.

22
23
24
25

[signature block continued on next page]

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE

-2-

CASE NO.: c 08-05129-JCS
23666\2902757.1

1

Dated: December __, 2011

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

2
/s/ Jeff D. Baxter
Jeffrey D. Baxter

3
4

Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
PRIMARION, INC., INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES AG, and INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE

-3-

CASE NO.: c 08-05129-JCS
23666\2902757.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The deadlines related to Defendants Motion for Leave To Amend To Dismiss Without

Prejudice To Defendants’ Counterclaims [Dkt. No. 1669] are as follows:

5
Event

Date

6

Volterra’s Opposition Due

January 6, 2012

7

Defendants’ Reply Due

January 13, 2012

8

Hearing

January 20, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.
February 17, 2012

9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10

13

R NIA

UNIT
ED

Jan. 9, 2012
DATED:_______________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

pero

H

ER

LI

RT

FO

NO

S
seph C.
______________________________________
Judge Jo
THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO

14
15
16

A

12

S

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE

-4-

CASE NO.: c 08-05129-JCS
23666\2902757.1