Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v. Primarion, Inc. et al

Filing 1767

PLEASE DISREGARD. POSTED IN ERROR. SEE DOCKET NO. 1765 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FURTHER SUPPLEMENTATION OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/8/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012) Modified on 5/9/2012 (klhS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. Case No. 08-5129 JCS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING FURTHER SUPPLEMENTATION OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES 15 16 17 18 PRIMARION, INC., a Delaware corporation, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, a German corporation, and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Location: Judge: Courtroom G - 15th Floor Honorable Joseph C. Spero Complaint Filed: November 12, 2008 Trial Date: November 1, 2012 19 Defendant. 20 21 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 22 23 WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties to the above-referenced case have met and conferred 24 regarding the relative needs and associated costs of any further supplementation of interrogatories 25 which each side has served on the other in this phase of the proceeding or to fully comply with 26 the Court’s Orders with respect to interrogatories at the April 27, 2012 discovery hearing and 27 have determined that agreement limiting any further respective obligations to provide 28 supplementation is in the best interests of both sides. Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION RE: FURTHER SUPPLEMENTATION OF ROG RESPONSES / CASE NO.: CV- 08-05129-JCS 23666\3047842.2 1 2 3 ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Neither side or any party will be required to prepare and serve any further 4 supplemental or amended responses to any of the interrogatories propounded in this phase of the 5 proceeding with the exception of: (a) Volterra supplementing Defendants’ Interrogatory Nos. 4 6 and 10 as ordered by the Court at the April 27, 2012 discovery hearing; and (b) Defendants 7 supplementing Volterra’s Interrogatory No. 7 as ordered by the Court on pages 7-9 of the 8 transcript of the April 27, 2012 discovery hearing. The parties will supplement the above- 9 referenced responses by no later than Monday, May 14, 2012. 10 2. Both sides agree that except as to the three interrogatories specifically noted above 11 in Paragraph 1, neither side will seek to compel any further responses to any other interrogatories 12 propounded in this phase, including without limitation any other interrogatories that were the 13 subject of the Court’s Orders at the discovery hearing held on April 27, 2012. 14 3. Both sides also agree that with the exception of the Court’s rulings and limitations 15 as reflected at pages 7-9 and 16-20 of the transcript of the April 27, 2012 discovery hearing with 16 respect to Defendants’ arguments or contentions as to willfulness, neither side will be barred or 17 precluded from presenting any evidence, contentions or testimony in any future proceedings in 18 this case based on the content of their responses to any interrogatories propounded in this phase, 19 including on the basis that such evidence, contentions, or testimony was not cited in responses to 20 such interrogatories. 21 22 4. This agreement shall not affect:  23 24 The Court’s Order at the April 27, 2012 discovery hearing with respect to Defendants’ Interrogatory Nos. 4 and 10 to Volterra;  The Court’s Orders on pages 7-9 of the transcript of the April 27, 2012 25 discovery hearing with respect to Defendants supplementing Volterra’s 26 Interrogatory No. 7; or 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 STIPULATION RE: FURTHER SUPPLEMENTATION OF ROG RESPONSES / CASE NO.: CV- 08-05129-JCS -2- 23666\3047842.2  1 The Court’s rulings and limitations as reflected at pages 16-20 of the transcript 2 of the April 27, 2012 discovery hearing with respect to Defendants’ arguments 3 or contentions as to willfulness. 4 5. Nothing in this stipulation shall waive the right of either side to seek leave of 5 Court to seek to reopen fact discovery based on a claim of unfair surprise with respect to 6 information disclosed in the other party’s expert reports. 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 Dated: May 2, 2012 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 9 I represent that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on this document. By: 10 11 /s/ James W. Morando James W. Morando Attorneys for Plaintiff VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation 12 13 14 15 Dated: May 2, 2012 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 16 By: 17 18 /s/ David G. Wille David G. Wille Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants PRIMARION, INC., INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP. 19 20 21 22 24 May 8, 2012 DATED: ___________________ Spero ______________________________________ seph C. Judge Jo THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO STIPULATION RE: FURTHER SUPPLEMENTATION OF ROG RESPONSES / CASE NO.: CV- 08-05129-JCS -3- A H ER LI RT 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 FO NO 27 R NIA 25 26 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T UNIT ED S PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 23 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23666\3047842.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?