National Lawyers' Guild San Francisco Chapter et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing 58

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/30/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 6/30/11* 1 2 3 TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Branch Director ERIC B. BECKENHAUER, CSBN 237526 Trial Attorney 4 5 6 7 U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20530 Telephone: (202) 514-3338 Facsimile: (202) 616-8470 E-mail: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov 8 Attorneys for Defendants 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 NATIONAL LAWYERS’ GUILD SAN FRANCISCO CHAPTER, et al., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 17 No. C 08-5137 RS JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., 18 Defendants. / 19 20 21 WHEREAS, in an effort to narrow the issues before the Court, 22 1. The parties have entered into a series of stipulations to stay proceedings since April 23 24, 2009, to allow Defendants to conduct secondary searches and process potentially responsive 24 records, and to allow the parties to confer in an effort to resolve Plaintiffs’ claims without the 25 Court’s intervention. On October 30, 2009, as a result of those negotiations, Plaintiffs stipulated that 26 they did not contest the adequacy of the searches performed by Defendants DHS, DHS-OIG, or 27 CIS, or the propriety of the withholdings made by DHS-OIG; accordingly, pursuant to Rule 28 NO. C 08-5137 RS JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FOR FEES AND COSTS 1 1 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal of this action with prejudice with respect 2 to those Defendants. Negotiations continued with respect to the remaining Defendants: CBP, 3 EOIR, and ICE. Most recently, on June 1, 2011, the Court approved the parties’ stipulations (a) to 4 further stay proceedings through and including August 31, 2011, and (b) to submit a joint report 5 advising the Court on the status of negotiations, and/or a stipulation proposing a schedule to govern 6 further proceedings, no later than August 31, 2011; and 7 2. As a result of those negotiations, Plaintiffs have stipulated that they do not contest 8 either the adequacy of the searches performed, or the propriety of the withholdings made, by CBP, 9 EOIR, and ICE. The parties now agree that all merits issues in this case have been resolved. 10 Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties are simultaneously filing a stipulation of 11 dismissal of this action with prejudice with respect to all remaining Defendants; and 12 3. The parties are engaged in discussions about whether an award of attorney’s fees 13 and costs is appropriate, and to that end, Plaintiffs have extended a proposal to Defendants. While 14 Defendants do not concede that Plaintiffs are entitled to recover any fees or costs in this case, and 15 reserve all rights to oppose any bill of costs or motion for attorney’s fees, they are carefully 16 considering Plaintiffs’ proposal. Under the local rules, any bill of costs or motion for attorney’s fees 17 would ordinarily be due within 14 days after entry of judgment. See Civil L.R. 54-1(a), 54-6(a). 18 Although further negotiation may eliminate the need for judicial resolution of any dispute over fees 19 or costs, the parties anticipate that it will take several months for their negotiations to conclude; and 20 WHEREAS it would minimize litigation costs and conserve judicial resources to permit the 21 parties to attempt to resolve any dispute over fees or costs without the Court’s intervention, 22 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between the parties, through 23 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file any 24 bill of costs and/or motion for attorney’s fees shall be extended by approximately three months, to 25 September 30, 2011, notwithstanding any local rule to the contrary. 26 // 27 // 28 // NO. C 08-5137 RS JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FOR FEES AND COSTS 2 1 Dated: June 29, 2011 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted, JAYASHRI SRIKANTIAH IMMIGRANTS’ RIGHTS CLINIC STANFORD LAW SCHOOL 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305 Tel: (650) 724-2442 Fax: (650) 723-4426 TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Branch Director LINTON JOAQUIN KAREN TUMLIN NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER 3435 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2850 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Tel: (213) 639-3900 Fax: (213) 639-3911 /s/ Eric B. Beckenhauer ERIC B. BECKENHAUER, CSBN 237526 Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20530 Telephone: (202) 514-3338 Facsimile: (202) 616-8470 E-mail: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov 11 12 13 14 15 16 /s/ Lisa A. Davis JARED KOPEL LISA A. DAVIS DOMINIQUE-CHANTALE ALEPIN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Tel: (650) 493-9300 Fax: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Defendants 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 20 In accordance with General Order 45(X), I hereby attest that I have obtained Lisa A. Davis’s concurrence in the filing of this document. /s/ Eric B. Beckenhauer ERIC B. BECKENHAUER 21 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER 23 24 Pursuant to stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file any bill of costs and/or motion for attorney’s fees shall be extended to September 30, 2011, notwithstanding any local rule to the contrary. 25 SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 6/30/11 Dated: ________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge NO. C 08-5137 RS JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FOR FEES AND COSTS 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?