National Lawyers' Guild San Francisco Chapter et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Filing
58
JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/30/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)
*E-Filed 6/30/11*
1
2
3
TONY WEST
Assistant Attorney General
JOHN R. TYLER
Assistant Branch Director
ERIC B. BECKENHAUER, CSBN 237526
Trial Attorney
4
5
6
7
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
20 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20530
Telephone: (202) 514-3338
Facsimile: (202) 616-8470
E-mail: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendants
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
NATIONAL LAWYERS’ GUILD SAN
FRANCISCO CHAPTER, et al.,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
17
No. C 08-5137 RS
JOINT STATUS REPORT
AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS
AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S
FEES; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, et al.,
18
Defendants.
/
19
20
21
WHEREAS, in an effort to narrow the issues before the Court,
22
1.
The parties have entered into a series of stipulations to stay proceedings since April
23
24, 2009, to allow Defendants to conduct secondary searches and process potentially responsive
24
records, and to allow the parties to confer in an effort to resolve Plaintiffs’ claims without the
25
Court’s intervention. On October 30, 2009, as a result of those negotiations, Plaintiffs stipulated that
26
they did not contest the adequacy of the searches performed by Defendants DHS, DHS-OIG, or
27
CIS, or the propriety of the withholdings made by DHS-OIG; accordingly, pursuant to Rule
28
NO. C 08-5137 RS
JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FOR FEES AND COSTS
1
1
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal of this action with prejudice with respect
2
to those Defendants. Negotiations continued with respect to the remaining Defendants: CBP,
3
EOIR, and ICE. Most recently, on June 1, 2011, the Court approved the parties’ stipulations (a) to
4
further stay proceedings through and including August 31, 2011, and (b) to submit a joint report
5
advising the Court on the status of negotiations, and/or a stipulation proposing a schedule to govern
6
further proceedings, no later than August 31, 2011; and
7
2.
As a result of those negotiations, Plaintiffs have stipulated that they do not contest
8
either the adequacy of the searches performed, or the propriety of the withholdings made, by CBP,
9
EOIR, and ICE. The parties now agree that all merits issues in this case have been resolved.
10
Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties are simultaneously filing a stipulation of
11
dismissal of this action with prejudice with respect to all remaining Defendants; and
12
3.
The parties are engaged in discussions about whether an award of attorney’s fees
13
and costs is appropriate, and to that end, Plaintiffs have extended a proposal to Defendants. While
14
Defendants do not concede that Plaintiffs are entitled to recover any fees or costs in this case, and
15
reserve all rights to oppose any bill of costs or motion for attorney’s fees, they are carefully
16
considering Plaintiffs’ proposal. Under the local rules, any bill of costs or motion for attorney’s fees
17
would ordinarily be due within 14 days after entry of judgment. See Civil L.R. 54-1(a), 54-6(a).
18
Although further negotiation may eliminate the need for judicial resolution of any dispute over fees
19
or costs, the parties anticipate that it will take several months for their negotiations to conclude; and
20
WHEREAS it would minimize litigation costs and conserve judicial resources to permit the
21
parties to attempt to resolve any dispute over fees or costs without the Court’s intervention,
22
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by and between the parties, through
23
undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file any
24
bill of costs and/or motion for attorney’s fees shall be extended by approximately three months, to
25
September 30, 2011, notwithstanding any local rule to the contrary.
26
//
27
//
28
//
NO. C 08-5137 RS
JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FOR FEES AND COSTS
2
1
Dated: June 29, 2011
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Respectfully submitted,
JAYASHRI SRIKANTIAH
IMMIGRANTS’ RIGHTS CLINIC
STANFORD LAW SCHOOL
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305
Tel: (650) 724-2442
Fax: (650) 723-4426
TONY WEST
Assistant Attorney General
JOHN R. TYLER
Assistant Branch Director
LINTON JOAQUIN
KAREN TUMLIN
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION
LAW CENTER
3435 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2850
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: (213) 639-3900
Fax: (213) 639-3911
/s/ Eric B. Beckenhauer
ERIC B. BECKENHAUER, CSBN 237526
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
20 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20530
Telephone: (202) 514-3338
Facsimile: (202) 616-8470
E-mail: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov
11
12
13
14
15
16
/s/ Lisa A. Davis
JARED KOPEL
LISA A. DAVIS
DOMINIQUE-CHANTALE ALEPIN
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH &
ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Tel: (650) 493-9300
Fax: (650) 565-5100
Attorneys for Defendants
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
19
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
20
In accordance with General Order 45(X), I hereby attest that I have obtained Lisa A. Davis’s
concurrence in the filing of this document.
/s/ Eric B. Beckenhauer
ERIC B. BECKENHAUER
21
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER
23
24
Pursuant to stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file any
bill of costs and/or motion for attorney’s fees shall be extended to September 30, 2011,
notwithstanding any local rule to the contrary.
25
SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
6/30/11
Dated: ________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
NO. C 08-5137 RS
JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE FOR FEES AND COSTS
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?