Harris v. Vector Marketing Corporation

Filing 100

ORDER Re Case Management Conference Statement. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/16/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION, Defendant. ___________________________________/ As reflected in the civil minutes dated November 16, 2009, the Court has scheduled a case management conference for December 16, 2009, at 10:30 a.m. and the parties are to file a joint statement a week prior thereto. Prior to the filing of that statement, the parties shall meet and confer about the best process to resolve expeditiously the issue of Ms. Harris' status as employee versus independent contractor. The parties shall consider employment of the class certification process as one option. See 5-23 Moore's Fed. Prac. -- Civ. § 23.82[2] ("On a motion for class certification, the court does not accept the class allegations in the complaint as true, as a court would in connection with a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Instead, the court must make whatever factual inquiries are necessary.") and § 23.84[2] ("A court should make whatever inquiries are necessary to determine /// /// /// /// /// ALICIA HARRIS, Plaintiff, No. C-08-5198 EMC ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 that all the Rule 23 requirements have been met, regardless of whether those determinations overlap with merits issues."). The joint statement shall be filed on December 9, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2009 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?