Harris v. Vector Marketing Corporation

Filing 211

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part #186 Plaintiff's Motion to Quash; granting in part, denying in part, and deferring in part #190 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2010)

Harris v. Vector Marketing Corporation

Doc. 211

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION, Defendant. ___________________________________/ ALICIA HARRIS, Plaintiff, No. C-08-5198 EMC ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH; AND GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, AND DEFERRING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION (Docket Nos. 186, 190) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On July 21, 2010, the Court held a hearing on two discovery motions filed by Plaintiff: (1) a motion to quash and (2) a motion to compel. This order memorializes the rulings made by the Court at the hearing. (1) The motion to quash is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant is entitled to

information verifying that Plaintiff attended and/or graduated from the schools at issue. The information shall be provided by July 28, 2010. The remaining information sought by Defendant shall not be produced. (2) The motion to compel is granted in part, denied, in part, and deferred in part. (a) The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff's request for a 30(b)(6)

deposition on the subject matter of the disposition of the knife sample kit upon being returned by a Sales Rep to Defendant. (b) The motion is granted to the extent Plaintiff seeks information about the sales

completed by Sales Reps in the period soon after completing the initial training. The motion is

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

deferred with respect to Plaintiff's request for information about the compensation received by Sales Reps. Plaintiff shall have until July 23, 2010, to file evidence supporting her contention that Defendant engaged in more than mere puffery regarding the amount of money earned by Sales Reps. Defendant shall have until July 27, 2010, to file a response to Plaintiff's evidentiary submission. (c) The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff's request for information about

the compensation of managers. (d) The motion is granted with respect to Plaintiff's request for information about

Sales Reps younger than eighteen years of age. (e) advanced training. This order disposes of Docket Nos. 186 and 190. IT IS SO ORDERED. The motion is denied with respect to Plaintiff's request for information about

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: July 23, 2010 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States Magistrate Judge

2