Bryan et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al

Filing 259

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 256 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (see order for details). (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016) (Entered: 02/16/2016) (with Judge's signature) (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

CHARLES RIDGEWAY, JAIME FAMOSO,
JOSHUA HAROLD, RICHARD BYERS, DAN
THATCHER, NINO PAGTAMA, WILLIE
FRANKLIN, TIM OPITZ, FARRIS DAY, KARL
MERHOFF, and MICHAEL KROHN,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 3:08-cv-05221-SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT WAL-MART STORES, INC.’S
EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO EXTEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFFS’
SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware
corporation d/b/a WAL-MART
TRANSPORTATION LLC, and Does One
through and including Doe Fifty,
Defendants.
[Previously captioned as Bryan et al. v. Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc.]

26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WAL-MART’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF, CASE NO. 08-5221-SI

1

Having reviewed all papers filed in support of and in opposition to Wal-Mart’s motion, and

2

for good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Wal-Mart’s Motion for Administrative Relief.

3

Wal-Mart shall have until the later of March 24, 2016 or two weeks after the completion of the 40

4

class member depositions and named Plaintiff depositions to file a response to Plaintiffs’ second

5

Motion for Summary Adjudication (ECF No. 255). Reply due: 4/8/16, Hearing scheduled for

6

April 22, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

25

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12

12/16/16

DATED: ____________________
Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WAL-MART’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF, CASE NO. 08-5221-SI