Barnes v. Astrue
Filing
29
ORDER re 28 STIPULATION for Extension of Time filed by Michael J. Astrue. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/20/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8943 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Theophous.Reagans@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SCOTT BARNES,
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________)
CIVIL NO. 3:08-CV-05275-MEJ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 25) be extended from October 20, 2009 to November 18, 2009. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant needs the additional time to further review the file and prepare a response in this matter. /// /// /// /// ///
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 October 20, 2009 Dated: _________________ Dated: October 20, 2009 Dated: October 20, 2009
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Joel William Roberts (As authorized via e-mail) JOEL WILLIAM ROBERTS Attorney for Plaintiff JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration /s/ Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
__________________________________ THE HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?