Johnson v. Interstate Distributor Co.
Filing
38
ORDER for voluntary dismissal without prejudice to plaintiff or the putative class. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/28/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009) Modified on 4/29/2009 (ys, COURT STAFF).
Case 3:08-cv-05309-SI
Document 37-3
Filed 04/24/2009
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Todd M. Schneider (State Bar #158253) Clint J. Brayton (State Bar #192214) Andrew P. Lee (State Bar #245903) SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL BRAYTON KONECKY LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 421-7100 Fax: (415) 421-7105 TTY: (415) 421-1665 Email: tschneider@schneiderwallace.com cbrayton@schneiderwallace.com alee@schneiderwallace.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and the putative class
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Johnson, et al. v. Interstate Distributor Company, Case No. 08-CV-5309-SI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KENNETH JOHNSON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTOR COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive; Defendants.
Case No. 08-CV-5309-SI Related to Case No. 08-CV-5414-SI Marine v. Interstate Distributor Company [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL The Honorable Susan Illston
Case 3:08-cv-05309-SI
Document 37-3
Filed 04/24/2009
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: _____________ IT IS SO ORDERED.
COURT ORDER GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN this Court hereby grants Plaintiff's Request for Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice to Plaintiff or the putative class.
____________________________ Honorable Susan Illston Judge of the U.S. District Court
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Johnson, et al. v. Interstate Distributor Company, Case No. 08-CV-5309-SI
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?