Bergman et al v. Thelen LLP et al
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS DARYL YEAKLE AND RAYMOND R. PLANTE TO INFORM COURT RE: CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 9, 2016. (Attachment: # 1) (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2016)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ADAM BERGMAN, et al.,
No. C-08-5322 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS
DARYL YEAKLE AND RAYMOND R.
PLANTE TO INFORM COURT RE:
CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On February 29, 2016, the above-titled action was reassigned to the undersigned.
In cases assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time to
reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including entry of final
judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b).
Defendant has consented to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in the
instant action (see Doc. No. 23), as have plaintiffs Adam Bergman, Kendrick Patterson,
Michael Attianese and Andrea Levy (see Doc. No. 13). The remaining two plaintiffs,
specifically, Daryl Yeakle and Raymond D. Plante, have not advised the Court as to
whether they so consent.
Accordingly, plaintiffs Daryl Yeakle and Raymond D. Plante are hereby DIRECTED
to advise the Court, no later than March 18, 2016, as to whether they consent to have a
magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in the instant action. For plaintiffs’
convenience, a consent form is attached hereto; forms are also available at
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.
The parties are further advised that they may jointly request assignment to a specific
magistrate judge. As defendant and four of the six plaintiffs have previously filed a general
consent, any such joint request must be made in a separate document filed concurrently
with any consent forms signed by plaintiffs Daryl Yeakle and Raymond D. Plante.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 9, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?